Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Have we seen the LAST of TB12 in Charlotte?


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

34 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

It's a prescription for weak ass simps.

Forgive me if I’m not fluent on the lingo… but wouldn’t a simp do anything to stay his wife and not get divorced?

Edit - Never mind… I see what you are saying.

Fugging Gen Z has created a whole new language that I’m trying to learn.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

He's become a Diva.  He doesn't follow the same rules as everyone else.  He blames everyone else but himself.  He's a statue behind a bad offensive line.

He wants to believe he can play forever; He's done and cannot and will not ever reach the SB again. 

He should have rode off into the Sunset with his boy Gronk with his final ring. 

He always has been for the most part and he does play by a different set of rules, I honestly don't think time beat him the destruction of his personal life has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

From what I gathered, it’s someone willing to do whatever they can to make their spouse happy… fug me… I thought all along that was called being a good person… I didn’t know there’s a specific name for it.

As long as it's a mutual respect and happiness I'd agree, But I think when we reach the point of the movie "Idiocracy" in the near future Gen Z will be seen as the linchpin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dunno, I’m glad Brady didn’t SIMP for some super model who wanted him to retire and he didn’t want to - good for him. she probably had zero idea how to handle not getting what she wanted.

unfortunately he’s about to get fuged by the outdated family/divorce justice system tho

some of you guys sound like you’d do anything for ass, it’s pathetic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He’s kind of overrated to be honest. Never really felt like a true #1 or elevated his play to become a guy the defense really has to worry about. 
    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
×
×
  • Create New...