Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College Games


Shocker
 Share

Recommended Posts

It may sound crazy now but if Henson Hooker and the Vols beat Georgia next week and Hooker shows out, there is a legit argument to be made that he is the best QB in this class. 
 

Will Levis worries me, I’m not so sure he has that “clutch gene.” A few weeks ago when he played a game with a number of NFL scouts and GMs in attendance, he played poorly and this game going head to head with Hooker he has played awful. That’s twice now where he could have played lights out under a lot of pressure and folded.

Perspective- Will Levis had thrown the same amount of interceptions in this game alone tonight than Hooker has the COMBINED entire years of this year and last year. That’s just nuts! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, UpstatePantherfan said:

It may sound crazy now but if Henson Hooker and the Vols beat Georgia next week and Hooker shows out, there is a legit argument to be made that he is the best QB in this class. 
 

Will Levis worries me, I’m not so sure he has that “clutch gene.” A few weeks ago when he played a game with a number of NFL scouts and GMs in attendance, he played poorly and this game going head to head with Hooker he has played awful. That’s twice now where he could have played lights out under a lot of pressure and folded.

Perspective- Will Levis had thrown the same amount of interceptions in this game alone tonight than Hooker has the COMBINED entire years of this year and last year. That’s just nuts! 

Hookers receivers are wide ass open and he has a decent line. And he's 92 years old.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, UpstatePantherfan said:

It may sound crazy now but if Henson Hooker and the Vols beat Georgia next week and Hooker shows out, there is a legit argument to be made that he is the best QB in this class. 
 

Will Levis worries me, I’m not so sure he has that “clutch gene.” A few weeks ago when he played a game with a number of NFL scouts and GMs in attendance, he played poorly and this game going head to head with Hooker he has played awful. That’s twice now where he could have played lights out under a lot of pressure and folded.

Perspective- Will Levis had thrown the same amount of interceptions in this game alone tonight than Hooker has the COMBINED entire years of this year and last year. That’s just nuts! 

Most NFL teams and scouts will hate the amount of hurry up that Hooker runs.

He’s looked good in Heupel’s offense but he also did not look as good when he was with Virginia Tech, who runs more of a pro style offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Most NFL teams and scouts will hate the amount of hurry up that Hooker runs.

He’s looked good in Heupel’s offense but he also did not look as good when he was with Virginia Tech, who runs more of a pro style offense.

Not the least bit worried about that, that’s nothing a great offensive minded coach couldn’t coach up. Cam literally ran a one read offense all throughout Auburn and literally didn’t even take a single snap under center during his time at Auburn, and look how he turned out. Hooker has the intangibles and that clutch gene in spades and if he balls out against GA, it’s a wrap 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, UpstatePantherfan said:

Not the least bit worried about that, that’s nothing a great offensive minded coach couldn’t coach up. Cam literally ran a one read offense all throughout Auburn and literally didn’t even take a single snap under center during his time at Auburn, and look how he turned out. Hooker has the intangibles and that clutch gene in spades and if he balls out against GA, it’s a wrap 

Defenses have changed since Cam killed everyone with the spread. I also don’t think Hooker is close to the player or athlete that Cam was.

I also don’t think Hooker has elite intangibles, I think he’s in a very simplified offense… I mean head to head he lost to Malik Willis and Liberty… in fact, Willis outplayed him.

And there’s zero chance he’s even considered as the number one overall pick. You might not care about his age but NFL teams do… if Hooker is taken in the first round, he’d be the third oldest QB selected in the first round since 1956… that’s first round… not number one overall… just first round.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...