Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How good is Brian Burns 2022 campaign?

micnificent28

By micnificent28,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

So 9 or 10 DEs with fewer sacks are better DEs. Just making sure. Regardless of where you put him and how many awful takes you have, I’d really be more apt to engage if you didn’t exclusively post about him after a loss. 

How about this

 

If the pff grade on Burns is greater then 60 from this game I will be banned for a week.  If its lower then 60 its you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Catsfan69 Grand Master

Catsfan69

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

So 9 or 10 DEs with fewer sacks are better DEs. Just making sure. Regardless of where you put him and how many awful takes you have, I’d really be more apt to engage if you didn’t exclusively post about him after a loss. 

He's not great. He's a slightly above average player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Carl Spackler Grand Master

Carl Spackler

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

How about this

 

If the pff grade on Burns is greater then 60 from this game I will be banned for a week.  If its lower then 60 its you. 

What’s hilarious about all this is he’s not even my favorite player, I just think he’s hideously under-appreciated by fans such as yourself. 

When does your ban from last week start?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
Just now, Carl Spackler said:

Why should I, when I can just avoid this thread like you did?

How the fug have I avoided this thread when I am the one bumping it?  Are you fuging high or something?  I post weekly about burns play during the game?  He got abused in the first half against det and the defense made adjustments and he had a good half in the 2nd.  Its in my history feel free to go back and read. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Carl Spackler Grand Master

Carl Spackler

Posted
Posted
Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

How the fug have I avoided this thread when I am the one bumping it?  Are you fuging high or something?  I post weekly about burns play during the game?  He got abused in the first half against det and the defense made adjustments and he had a good half in the 2nd.  It’s in my history feel free to go back and read. 

I’m the high one? You’re the one who thinks Brian Burns, third among all DEs in sacks, is worse than a dozen players with inferior statistics. 

You jumped at the chance to bump this thread this week, but when Burns has a good game, it collects dust. You don’t get to bump threads after bad games and pretend they don’t exist after good ones, then question MY sanity 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
Just now, Carl Spackler said:

I’m the high one? You’re the one who thinks Brian Burns, third among all DEs in sacks, is worse than a dozen players with inferior statistics. 

You jumped at the chance to bump this thread this week, but when Burns has a good game, it collects dust. You don’t get to bump threads after bad games and pretend they don’t exist after good ones, then question MY sanity 😂

So do you want to accept my bet or not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KillaCamNewton Community Regular

KillaCamNewton

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

peppers was in the dpoy voting in his 3rd season.  What in the holy fug is Carl talking about?

He also came here at age 37 to be a situational pass rusher and retire at home and gave us virtually the same production Burns gave us this year in his first contract year lmao

  • Pie 1
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ForJimmy
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • tukafan21
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
    • TD alt
      Monroe Freeling’s lovely GF

      By TD alt · Posted

      He was also apparently.
×
×
  • Create New...