Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

McCown has already been scouting QBs


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

And he's older than the vast majority of draft prospects. I'd feel differently about him if he was a redshirt sophomore but this guy shouldn't be so raw at this stage.

The age think is easily the most overplayed thing in the draft game, especially for QB's.

All of these guys are young enough to navigate a learning curve and that position has extreme longevity unless you are a bruising runner.

I think the question is if he is actually raw or he has some fundamental flaw in processing. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

The age think is easily the most overplayed thing in the draft game, especially for QB's.

All of these guys are young enough to navigate a learning curve and that position has extreme longevity unless you are a bruising runner.

I think the question is if he is actually raw or he has some fundamental flaw in processing. 

What I don't like is Pickett was supposed to carve up teams at his age, and he did his last year. Hooker was tearing it up before the ACL as expected. Levis actually looked worse than the previous year, everyone started out bragging about his experience in a "pro style offense" and then halfway through the year it was nothing but excuses. Not saying you're a fan of any of these guys but a 24/25 year old should be putting up really good stats. Stetson Bennet it probably a 5th rounder and Levis is top 10, Hooker is day 2? There is definitely bias at the media level at the least

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

The age think is easily the most overplayed thing in the draft game, especially for QB's.

All of these guys are young enough to navigate a learning curve and that position has extreme longevity unless you are a bruising runner.

I think the question is if he is actually raw or he has some fundamental flaw in processing. 

It's not the age as much as it is the years of experience and maturity level. He has a lot of experience. He should be more mentally and emotionally mature at 23, soon to be 24 than the average college kid. It all adds up to say that he should be far further along in his development process than he is. That's what I mean when bringing up his age.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

What I don't like is Pickett was supposed to carve up teams at his age, and he did his last year. Hooker was tearing it up before the ACL as expected. Levis actually looked worse than the previous year, everyone started out bragging about his experience in a "pro style offense" and then halfway through the year it was nothing but excuses. Not saying you're a fan of any of these guys but a 24/25 year old should be putting up really good stats. Stetson Bennet it probably a 5th rounder and Levis is top 10, Hooker is day 2? There is definitely bias at the media level at the least

 

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's not the age as much as it is the years of experience and maturity level. He has a lot of experience. He should be more mentally and emotionally mature at 23, soon to be 24 than the average college kid. It all adds up to say that he should be far further along in his development process than he is. That's what I mean when bringing up his age.

Yeah, the improvement question is valid. That's always valid when you are an older player. It's also the classic thing that tanks draft stock on older players. Not stepping up and getting better.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don’t think people are saying that picking up the option s a call for the pitchforks. We would have had to do things differently a couple of years back to make declining the option a valid move. We didn’t and here we are. People largely accept that. The patter it adheres to, reinforces the nausea we feel when the idea of an extension, and at top of the market no less, comes up.  One that he hasn’t shown he deserves.   Same as he did not deserve to be drafted 1.1. Look at Pavia and what really is the difference? Bryce is a nice guy and Pavia is an asshole lol. They are both no margin for error non day one talents. One went undrafted.  
    • We hate losing. I don't know Bryce to hate him. His play as a QB, I absolutely hate. It's just not good enough. If there were a lottery held to select the order and all 32 starting QBs could be drafted as the starting QB for whatever team selected them, how long do you think it would be before Bryce's name was called? Top 10, top 20, bottom 8? Think about it.  For me, having never seen back to back games with franchise QB level performance in 3 years tells me what I need to know. We still need to be looking for our solution at QB.     
    • Dude, I'm saying the Cardinals have proven they know nothing. Not saying keeping Bryce is the best choice long term, just saying that we've made the right move for this moment in time.  But man, the Cardinals are never a blueprint for success. Haven't been since they were in Chicago.
×
×
  • Create New...