Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carr Watch


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Shocker said:

If Lamar is traded he will set the market IMO.  I mean the market is Deshaun Watsons deal which is honestly ludicrous 

The market is what a team is willing to pay for that specific player.  It doesn't mean that every FA qb that comes after is worth that much.  They may think they are as Lamar is about to find out but that doesn't mean every team out there is lining up to give him that and more. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Yeah, Carr looked horrible last season.  Worrisome until you realize McDaniels took away Carr's ablility to change plays at the line last year.  Derek is well known for his late game winning drives and that was taken away from him thanks to McDaniels who has a history of destroying teams as HC.

McDaniels and Mark Davis are a lethal dose of Dumb and Dumber.

I know but Reich did this in Indy and we did the exact same here…making the excuses that the other teams are lame and terrible and we can fix em.  It has not worked outside of Stafford who worked out in LA for a multitude of reasons.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I guarantee you other teams will pay Lamar that money.

The Ravens have always been cheap with their players.

 

You think teams went after Deshaun Watson and his baggage off the field but you think Lamar wont get the same treatment?

 

Cmon guys don't overthink this. Lamar is definitely getting paid it will just be from another team. Atlanta will definitely give him the Watson contract.

If you're scared mf go to church.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

The market is what a team is willing to pay for that specific player.  It doesn't mean that every FA qb that comes after is worth that much.  They may think they are as Lamar is about to find out but that doesn't mean every team out there is lining up to give him that and more. 

If a team trades the assets we are talking about for Lamar they are definitely locking him up.  He will get some crazy deal.  It’s happening 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Not paying Lamar who makes his living running the ball and has missed big time the last 2 season some albatross guaranteed deal isn’t feeling scared.  It’s being smart.

I was calling him out for being afraid of Lamar going to Atlanta. He thinks we should sign him because they want Lamar and will crush us with him.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

No I want us to sign him because he gives us the best chance to win a SB.

 

But people seem to love the castoff vet QB's. 

 

Nobody wants a franchise QB anymore they just want just another guy and continue to build the team. Then they wonder why every year we are looking for a QB. 

He can't even take the Ravens to the SB. Just stop before you say something stupid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...