Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Ravens can’t be this dumb? They’re a smart organization right?


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

Falcons might be all over that....

That would be a good bet.

1 minute ago, Mage said:

I like Stephen A, but I'll trust the reporting we have heard over the last 6 or however many months over him.  He's more connected to the NBA than the NFL.

Not saying he's wrong.  Him/his source could be right! But until other sources chime in saying the same thing, then my belief is that Jackson is searching for a contract in the same vein as Watson's.

Plus, no high-end QB has signed a long-term extension since then right?  It makes sense as to why he would expect that.

Jackson arguably deserves a contract akin to Watson's. I believe that someone will likely offer him 230-240 guaranteed also with more years on top that are essentially voidable. But we'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The idea of Steven A being right and pretty much everybody else being wrong is a little too farfetched for me.

Every NFL player "wants" a fully guaranteed contract, but that doesn't mean that Jackson's camp actually "asked" for or "demanded" one.  

It has been reported that the Ravens offered him $133 bil fully guaranteed. That's not going to fly, and I don't blame Jackson for getting as much as he can.

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, top dawg said:

Every NFL player "wants" a fully guaranteed contract, but that doesn't mean that Jackson's camp actually "asked" for or "demanded" one.  

It has been reported that tje Ravens offered him $133 bil fully guaranteed. That's not going to fly, and I don't blame Jackson for getting as much as he can.

Dude, even the NFLPA pretty much confirmed it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, top dawg said:

"Pretty much" confirming and confirming something without question are not exactly the same thing, at all.

Believing what the evidence tells you and believing what you want to believe aren't the same thing either.

Between the NFLPA encouraging Jackson to stick to his guns with regard to a fully guaranteed contract and pretty much every source outside of Steven A Smith confirming that's what he wants, If you still think that's not what he's asking for, you're wearing blinders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

You are the only source. I never seen a guy who thinks he knows more than actual insiders.lol

 

Never change my man.

That is exactly the point. Steven A is not an insider. He even said so himself, that he is not refuting the others who have covered it, he's just echoing what he was told by Lamar's camp. People can be very clever with wording. The truth is usually somewhere in between. Maybe he isn't demanding a fully guaranteed contract but a guaranteed amount, greater than Watson's guaranteed amount, would be my guess, regardless of a non guaranteed amount beyond that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Believing what the evidence tells you and believing what you want to believe aren't the same thing either.

Between the NFLPA encouraging Jackson to stick to his guns with regard to a fully guaranteed contract and pretty much every source outside of Steven A Smith confirming that's what he wants, If you still think that's not what he's asking for, you're wearing blinders.

Of course the NFLPA wants him to get a fully guaranteed contract. That's like the holy grail for NFL players. The Browns opened Pandora's box, and now most of the owners are tryinng to close it back.I think all their contracts should be guaranteed. So if he did good on him. But words do matter, and it's not like we have seen anything definitive.

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CamWhoaaCam said:

Im not talking about just this report. You act like your source is the only source that matters on all topics.

Then when somebody post a source saying something totally opposite you try to find a source that says something different.

Rumors are floating around heavy around this time of year. We don't know who to trust. 

The irony is strong in this one 😆

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The irony is strong in this one 😆

Not really. You just don't like the fact that Stephen A. reported something seemingly at odds with the grain. Notice that he has not recanted a damned thing, and there's a reason why. 

Edited by top dawg
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah bad angle for her.   I just watched something on this and I didn’t know so maybe someone else didn’t know either… NFL policy these days on this is they don’t hand out any discipline until the legal process is complete.  The option mentioned was ‘paid leave’ in the interim.    Falcons are likely going to have to pay him but not have him, and he will probably be able to afford his attorneys. 
    • It isn't about looking bad, it's about proving the person that made the draft pick is right. Do I have definitive proof? No. What i do have are a series of events that when placed in order make no sense unless the purpose is to protect Bryce from being outshone by another QB and benched/cut.  1. Hiring of Reich to build his offense. Darnold is released and Reich gets to pick a shiny new QB to work with. After all, we signed him to a six year contract, so it's fair to assume he would have major influence in that decision.  2. Bryce interviews privately with Tepper, where he wows them with his ability to break down a play over dinner. By all accounts, Bryce is a very likeable, charming guy being interviewed. Even brought up here recently after an interview he did.  3. The sudden emergence of the S2 as the new "it" test to determine QB prowess after it's revealed Purdy, Mr Irrelevant himself, scored high and displaced the 9ers costly 1st round pick, Trey Lance. Bryce scores off the charts, and Stroud's results are "leaked" and he's publicly shamed as an imbecile going into the draft process. 4. Bryce is selected 1st overall, a QB that in no way fits Reich's QB type. Frank becomes disinterested, doesn't appear to put much effort into developing an offense for Bryce, round peg, square hole deal.  5. An obviously unprepared Bryce is named starter, and goes on to have one of the worst rookie seasons in NFL history. The only game he didn't play, Dalton, in Seattle in the rain with Zavala giving up 14 pressures in that game, made the offense look alive, something we hadn't seen from Bryce. Bryce returns, offense goes back to crap.  6. Season 2, new HC, a QB whisperer to fix Bryce. Dalton returns and the only other camp competition is Plummer, who looks like he might actually be the worst QB not named Jimmy Claussen to ever get a number in camp. Bryce named starter again after leading the team yo the 1st overall pick, which was part of the package we traded away to get him.  7. Bryce is benched, Dalton comes in, starts 5 games, less than 100k yards, 7tds 6 ints, and makes it pretty clear he's not the long term answer for anything, not even being a backup. Bryce returns after Dalton's car crash and finishes the season playing better, but still not enough to guarantee he's the future.  8. This past off-season, Dalton gets a 2 year, almost fully guaranteed deal, when there are FA backups available who at least have potential if Bryce gets benched or injured again. One of those backups actually put up better numbers in 5 less games this year than Bryce, in case you were wondering. Then, lo and behold, Plummer is brought back for training camp. The guy so bad people were calling for him to be cut for the hot dog guy, or maybe Terry Bradshaw, the senile version on Fox. Plummer is cut again, shocker, and away we go into 2025.  9. Bryce starts off the year in typical fashion, lays a couple duds, then gets bailed out by Rico running wild for over 500 yards against the 2 worst defenses in the NFL. The entire season is up and down, with one exceptional game against Atlanta followed by a sewer plunge in Seattle. Multiple opportunities to win the division or win the big game when needed. Didn't show up for those. Finally breaks 3k yards for the season on a Standford band prayer. We make the playoffs when Tampa loses, since we couldn't do it ourselves. Bryce has a playoff game highlighted by a few beautiful throws and a final drive that looked like a deer in the headlights. 4 and out, 3 timeouts left unused.  Now you could say that's a whole lot of nothing, but I see a whole lot of shielding to keep a bottom tier performing QB shielded from any real competition in the QB room. And I was right about Dalton. One game when Bryce was injured, and he looked worse than done. Phillip Rivers played better after being on his couch for 3 years. And let's not forget, Bryce also refuses to do anything about his footwork which is constantly being brought up. He says it's fine.  So why did they pick up the 5th year? Who knows. I still say they should have played him on the final year of his contract as a one year prove it deal. But when you look at everything and the way it's transpired, I think it's pretty easy to see that someone at the top has been out to prove he made the right choice and that is David Tepper. So in response to the original question i commented on, what has Bryce done to guarantee the starting spot to the point of not even putting a viable backup at the number 2 spot? Not a damn thing
    • I held a similar opinion, ie he was gonna play how he wanted to play. So that’s the offense you end up with.  Even if you would rather take a more traditional approach it would hard because, he was going to play how he wanted to play.     I thought he saw himself as the number one weapon. Did I want a more diverse attack with more pocket passes and less running and option type plays? Yep.    Chudzinski’s 2nd year here I thought he was getting too cute and chasing a HC job, which he got, but I would like to have seen him committed to running an offense he built around Cam.    I think we missed out on that type of opportunity, getting Shula.  But one thing about him, Ron didn’t have to worry about losing his OC every couple of years to a HC job. Lol.
×
×
  • Create New...