Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

An updated look at our cap, and where we are spending it


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Htarnation4.0 said:

So I literally cannot keep up with the cap thing, so could someone help me out with what our cap space will look like next year? Cap only seems to matter with the Panthers btw. Every other franchise, particularly the Saints, always seem to have money to throw around.

Since cap from future years can essentially be used in the current year, I find it more informative to look at a teams 3 year projected cap space to understand a teams cap health.

https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/2025/

A good example of this is the Saints who are already -$91M over the projected cap for 2024. Since there is no penalty for being over the cap in future seasons they can just wait until March of 2024 to pay that bill off with the 2025 and 2026 credit cards.

As of this writing, the Panthers have 8th most cap space to spend over the next 3 seasons. Once Burns is extended the long term cap space will go down a bit.

Edited by Evil Hurney
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Basbear said:

Form teddy to paradis to CMC to anderson to reddick. They have average 50 fuccccking miilion each year. That must be the NFL record over 3 years, Id bet green cash it is.

Awful finessererererererrrrrr.

Where are alllll those "restructure" is totally fine peeps, SPEAK UP!!!

Here is a summary of historical dead cap usage as far back as OTC had it:

image.png.4ab80630f58edbc641389c302a388068.png

These numbers are being reported as a percentage of the base salary cap for that season.

As far as 3 year spans go, the highest average dead cap pct goes to:

1) Panthers from 2020-2022
2) Eagles from 2020-2022
3) Texans from 2020-2022
4) Saints from 2015-2017
5) Bills from 2016-2018

Regarding the restructures, they largely aren't a problem. The team trades roster flexibility for financial flexibility in the current season. This works out fine as long as they don't plan to cut (or in the case of DJ, trade) the player that season. They purposely didn't restructure DJ since he was part of trade talks.

Over the life of the contract the team still ends up accruing the same cap hit . It just "looks" bad because most of the cap hit comes at the end. (2,4,24 instead of 9,10,11).

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Evil Hurney said:

Here is a summary of historical dead cap usage as far back as OTC had it:

image.png.4ab80630f58edbc641389c302a388068.png

These numbers are being reported as a percentage of the base salary cap for that season.

As far as 3 year spans go, the highest average dead cap pct goes to:

1) Panthers from 2020-2022
2) Eagles from 2020-2022
3) Texans from 2020-2022
4) Saints from 2015-2017
5) Bills from 2016-2018

Regarding the restructures, they largely aren't a problem. The team trades roster flexibility for financial flexibility in the current season. This works out fine as long as they don't plan to cut (or in the case of DJ, trade) the player that season. They purposely didn't restructure DJ since he was part of trade talks.

Over the life of the contract the team still ends up accruing the same cap hit . It just "looks" bad because most of the cap hit comes at the end. (2,4,24 instead of 9,10,11).

Thanks, bro!!

Lots of work in this and I always like when my wild claims end up being true!

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Reasonable. I mean I didn’t see a clear path to relief this season myself. As I have typed already, I think the QB FA class is more interesting next season and that draft is supposed to be stacked as well. There just weren’t many options this year.  When you have Tepper to contend with you have to tread lightly around this unless you are 100% certain and willIng to stake your job on it.   There were a couple of outings that helped Bryce a lot in terms of  thinking maybe he can do this, and if you are a supporter you are giving them a lot of weight. You are likely to think just get him some more help and he can do that every week. Which I think Tepper falls into that category.  And the playoffs, division champs, regardless of the way I see that, the supporters will also give that a lot of weight.    And the big one, the atmosphere In BOA for that WC game, Tepper had to be soiling himself over that. If you pulled Bryce out right now you had better be right and your new guy had better make the playoffs and look good doing it or you will be gone and your chance to build your old team back into respectability will be gone too.  So here we have Pickett on a one year deal, and Grier and King. I understand it.  
×
×
  • Create New...