Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Just for the sake of discussion, is there a correlation between size and injury?


rayzor
 Share

Recommended Posts

i have been thinking about this and i'm sure most of you have been as well. we're concerned about Young's size and how likely it is for him to get injured by players twice his size.

i know it makes sense that it would be a major concern, but is that concern really warranted? Are smaller framed players, especially QBs, more prone to injury than larger ones?

Just like the issue of batted down passes, there are some players more prone to having them batted down, but it isn't because of their height. Could it be that the stats bear out that size isn't really a factor in frequency of injury for QBs? 

Thanks to @stan786 for finding this article on weight vs. injuries https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stat-analysis/2018/weight-and-injuries

I'm going to let you all look at it and see what you think and also see if you can find anymore studies showing this.

again, it makes sense that it would be a concern, but is the concern warranted by any actual stats? or is it all, "he's so small and they're so big!!!"?

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For Young I think it is size combined with his playing style.  Running around extending plays is awesome, but it definitely leads to extra hits.  So it's the size plus the number of hits he takes.  You also don't want to take that part of his game away because that is where he excels.  If he was a pocket guy that got the ball out quickly and avoided hits, the size wouldn't be as much of a concern (like Drew Brees).  

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

For Young I think it is size combined with his playing style.  Running around extending plays is awesome, but it definitely leads to extra hits.  So it's the size plus the number of hits he takes.  You also don't want to take that part of his game away because that is where he excels.  If he was a pocket guy that got the ball out quickly and avoided hits, the size wouldn't be as much of a concern (like Drew Brees).  

I feel like while yes him running can increase the number of hits taken, you cant remove the amount he's avoiding by moving from the equation. Even for running QBs the pocket is where the far majority of QB injuries occur, being able to navigate the pocket and avoid some of that mess also needs to be factored a bit.

I'd argue Brees and Young in pocket move very similarly watching them, while Bryce does end up extending stuff I havent seen on tape where it leads to a signficant increase in bigger hits or anything.

Though I will curb this with a point in your favor where Bryce's one shoulder injury came from trying to get the ball out falling into the sidelines, reminded me a little of Cam and that tackle against San Diego where he just fell out it at a weird angle.

Edited by stan786
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, rayzor said:

i have been thinking about this and i'm sure most of you have been as well. we're concerned about Young's size and how likely it is for him to get injured by players twice his size.

i know it makes sense that it would be a major concern, but is that concern really warranted? Are smaller framed players, especially QBs, more prone to injury than larger ones?

Just like the issue of batted down passes, there are some players more prone to having them batted down, but it isn't because of their height. Could it be that the stats bear out that size isn't really a factor in frequency of injury for QBs? 

Thanks to @stan786 for finding this article on weight vs. injuries https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stat-analysis/2018/weight-and-injuries

I'm going to let you all look at it and see what you think and also see if you can find anymore studies showing this.

again, it makes sense that it would be a concern, but is the concern warranted by any actual stats? or is it all, "he's so small and they're so big!!!"?

I think all one needs to know about size and the qb position is that young would literally be the smallest to play the position by a country mile and that’s telling.   So you are banging on young to be the anomaly of all anomalies.   That’s a huge gamble when jobs are on the line.   

  • Pie 4
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can say past isn't relevant to QB size because it all changed with Brees and Wilson....that could be true.

It's also could be true that typically smaller players can't hold up, nor can they typically make the throws needed to get to the next level at QB.

That said, there are very few starts in this league by guys 6' and under, compared to 6'3" and over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been arguing this in this chat for a while so it'll come as no surprise here.

I'd love to see something other than people giving me a gut feel on where the magical number on the scale is that injuries happen less. Kyler isnt that much smaller than CJ but they use him as an example, Tua weighs more than CJ but they use him as an example.

There is plenty of QBs big and small that have been hurt at differing rates in the NFL. There have been small QBs that have played for 15+ years, there have been big QBs who've only made it like 6-7. There is so many factors in play when it comes to QB weight and there really isnt any data that correlates with skinner players being hurt at some insane rate.

I know it feels good to just logically think about it, but feels like there is a large portion of this board automatically downgrading a player based on something they feel should be true but hasnt played out that way.

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stan786 said:

I feel like while yes him running can increase the number of hits taken, you cant remove the amount he's avoiding by moving from the equation. Even for running QBs the pocket is where the far majority of QB injuries occur, being able to navigate the pocket and avoid some of that mess also needs to be factored a bit.

I'd argue Brees and Young in pocket move very similarly watching them, while Bryce does end up extending stuff I havent seen on tape where it leads to a signficant increase in bigger hits or anything.

Though I will curb this with a point in your favor where Bryce's one shoulder injury came from trying to get the ball out falling into the sidelines, reminded me a little of Cam and that tackle against San Diego where he just fell out it at a weird angle.

I will say this too.  He seems very good at taking hits as funny as that sounds.  I noticed he really kind of gives himself up and kind of absorbs the hit.  Those type of hits are usually pretty mild.  Someone on here compared it to drunk drivers rarely getting as injured because their bodies are relaxes the whole time.  I also think his size is going to limit some of our play calling, but if he excels at what he does I am not sure that matters as much.  

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, rightturn said:

I think all one needs to know about size and the qb position is that young would literally be the smallest to play the position by a country mile and that’s telling.   So you are banging on young to be the anomaly of all anomalies.   That’s a huge gamble when jobs are on the line.   

but what about for other smaller QBs, because he might be the smallest, but he's not the only smaller QB to play. Were they more prone to injury than any other QBs? I mean is there enough evidence showing that we would be walking into a dangerous situation other than speculating because he is so small?

I'm not looking for "common sense" because common sense is often subjective, but i am looking for data to show this is something that we should really be concerned about.

I mean all we have right now is a lot of opinions stating that it's an issue because either it "makes sense" that it would be an issue or because we've never seen someone that small take on the role.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ForJimmy said:

I will say this too.  He seems very good at taking hits as funny as that sounds.  I noticed he really kind of gives himself up and kind of absorbs the hit.  Those type of hits are usually pretty mild.  Someone on here compared it to drunk drivers rarely getting as injured because their bodies are relaxes the whole time.  I also think his size is going to limit some of our play calling, but if he excels at what he does I am not sure that matters as much.  

I do think his size will limit some of our play calling as well and I can see that being an argument for sure. I also think that could explain why lighter QBs are getting hurt less, because maybe their coaches purposefully put them in harms way less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

For Young I think it is size combined with his playing style.  Running around extending plays is awesome, but it definitely leads to extra hits.  So it's the size plus the number of hits he takes.  You also don't want to take that part of his game away because that is where he excels.  If he was a pocket guy that got the ball out quickly and avoided hits, the size wouldn't be as much of a concern (like Drew Brees).  

but will his elusiveness and spacial awareness keep him from taking more hits and will his flexibility allow him to cut down on the force of blows? 

i think if he was more of a pocket QB that he would be more prone to taking big hits. Scrambling around the backfield usually makes a QB less likely to take a hit. I think Cam's worse injuries happened when he was in the pocket and wasn't on the move. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

You can say past isn't relevant to QB size because it all changed with Brees and Wilson....that could be true.

It's also could be true that typically smaller players can't hold up, nor can they typically make the throws needed to get to the next level at QB.

That said, there are very few starts in this league by guys 6' and under, compared to 6'3" and over.

that one study that @stan786shared in the other thread that i posted in here showed that the larger the player was, the more prone to injury they were. of course i don't think this was talking about contact injuries specifically, just all injuries. But even if you were to isolate contact injuries, would size be a quantifiable factor?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, rayzor said:

but what about for other smaller QBs, because he might be the smallest, but he's not the only smaller QB to play. Were they more prone to injury than any other QBs? I mean is there enough evidence showing that we would be walking into a dangerous situation other than speculating because he is so small?

I'm not looking for "common sense" because common sense is often subjective, but i am looking for data to show this is something that we should really be concerned about.

I mean all we have right now is a lot of opinions stating that it's an issue because either it "makes sense" that it would be an issue or because we've never seen someone that small take on the role.

It's not common sense. It's literally a data point that he would be the smallest in modern history.   There are multiple layered reasons for this. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, stan786 said:

I do think his size will limit some of our play calling as well and I can see that being an argument for sure. I also think that could explain why lighter QBs are getting hurt less, because maybe their coaches purposefully put them in harms way less.

Yeah and I am not sure you want him taking snaps from under center.  He never really did in college.  I mean his size will be outside the data range of successful QBs, so it's really hard to estimate what that looks like.  People keep bringing up Brees, but Bress has like 2 inches and 20ish pounds on Young.  Comparing Brees's size to Young is like comparing Mahomes's size to Brees.  It's still more significant than some people are thinking on here.  

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
    • Won’t stop until people stop buying overpriced poo.
×
×
  • Create New...