Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Just for the sake of discussion, is there a correlation between size and injury?


rayzor
 Share

Recommended Posts

We're basically hoping that Bryce Young is the football equivalent of Allen Iverson. While basketball is certainly nothing compared to football in terms of the physical toll on the body, that was also a different era of basketball. Iverson got pounded on. With his style of play it was amazing he held up. But he did. He was certainly an anomaly in terms of size on an NBA court. He was only about 165.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We're basically hoping that Bryce Young is the football equivalent of Allen Iverson. While basketball is certainly nothing compared to football in terms of the physical toll on the body, that was also a different era of basketball. Iverson got pounded on. With his style of play it was amazing he held up. But he did. He was certainly an anomaly in terms of size on an NBA court. He was only about 165.

 

You can do that when you have elite skills/talent. That's what Bryce fans see in his film.

Edited by ECHornet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, rightturn said:

It's not common sense. It's literally a data point that he would be the smallest in modern history.   There are multiple layered reasons for this. 

but it's all just supposition that he's going to have a short career and injury prone because of his size.

there's no debating his size, and i think his playing weight is around 190. its just a data point, nothing more.

there's nothing to show that he'd be more prone to injury than QBs 10, 20, or even 30 pounds more than him. if the only factor in play was his size, then that would probably be an issue. but there's a whole lot more to the story than his size. Tua wasn't concussed frequently because of his size compared to other QBs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

You can do that when you have elite skills/talent. That's what Bryce fans see in his film.

Skills and talent have little to do with injuries. There's a looooooong list of guys with elite potential who have been detailed by injuries. A lot is due to things you can't control - mainly genetics and luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, rippadonn said:

Question, without Alabama's blue chip line and say an Ole' Miss line instead, would he be the same player or still be in one piece? 

A team picking top ten usually doesn't have the best offensive line in NFL football.

I guess I wasnt super impressed with Bama's line this year, I think it definitely was average at best. I do wonder for both him and CJ what would have happened without what they had.

Does Bryce end up just getting washed out early by all the pressure in his face trying to be super man or is he able to win by doing what he does.

Does CJ Stroud without 2 first round caliber tackles show a lot more of those struggles vs the pass rush or does he get to show actual ability in that regard more having to deal with it, like he did vs Georgia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, stan786 said:

I guess I wasnt super impressed with Bama's line this year, I think it definitely was average at best. I do wonder for both him and CJ what would have happened without what they had.

Does Bryce end up just getting washed out early by all the pressure in his face trying to be super man or is he able to win by doing what he does.

Does CJ Stroud without 2 first round caliber tackles show a lot more of those struggles vs the pass rush or does he get to show actual ability in that regard more having to deal with it, like he did vs Georgia.

Average? Alabama's OL was AVERAGE? 😂

Maybe average for a top 10 team. Definitely not average among the totality of the 125 D1 football teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's too small. I'm not in charge though. If he is the pick I certainly hope he is able to overcome what seems like a disadvantage.

 Additionally, we have all seen players that perform magnificently in college and then falter at the next level, for various reasons. 

Edited by UnluckyforSome
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

Question, without Alabama's blue chip line and say an Ole' Miss line instead, would he be the same player or still be in one piece? 

A team picking top ten usually doesn't have the best offensive line in NFL football.

Answer: Yes

And we have a top 10 OL when healthy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Skills and talent have little to do with injuries. There's a looooooong list of guys with elite potential who have been detailed by injuries. A lot is due to things you can't control - mainly genetics and luck.

I guess this very much ties into my stance. There are a ton of players who are injury prone of all sizes, its so much to do with genetics and luck. I still think about how unlucky Cam was that tackle attempt vs the Charges started his downward trend. I'm sure weight goes somewhat into the equation honestly both ways, running to much weight on your frame can cause injuries as well, but I think end of the day no one knows how injury prone any specific player is going to be, there are so many variables to it. Not sure how you can discount anyone really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Average? Alabama's OL was AVERAGE? 😂

Maybe average for a top 10 team. Definitely not average among the totality of the 125 D1 football teams.

Bama's online last year comped to what they usually run with was middle of the pack SEC, it was really surprising tbh.

Year before they were fantastic. So its not like he had to depend on an "average" (poor guy) line his whole career or anything. It was plenty enough to be a positive for him.

Edited by stan786
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Skills and talent have little to do with injuries. There's a looooooong list of guys with elite potential who have been detailed by injuries. A lot is due to things you can't control - mainly genetics and luck.

The only actual data in this thread points to Stroud being more at risk of injury than Young due to weight. It's not definitive, but more convincing than all the gut feels of Huddle posters.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, stan786 said:

I guess this very much ties into my stance. There are a ton of players who are injury prone of all sizes, its so much to do with genetics and luck. I still think about how unlucky Cam was that tackle attempt vs the Charges started his downward trend. I'm sure weight goes somewhat into the equation honestly both ways, running to much weight on your frame can cause injuries as well, but I think end of the day no one knows how injury prone any specific player is going to be, there are so many variables to it. Not sure how you can discount anyone really.

There's no crystal ball, that's for sure. NFL front offices LOVE comps though. They get nervous with outliers. 

Make no mistake, Bryce Young's size is being rigorously debated behind closed doors among every team holding a high pick and looking at QBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, stan786 said:

Bama's online last year comped to what they usually run with was middle of the pack SEC, it was really surprising tbh.

That's the thing though. People watching Bama are accustomed to basically seeing an NFL OL. Virtually everyone that starts meaningful games at Bama on the OL is going to get a shot at the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
    • Won’t stop until people stop buying overpriced poo.
×
×
  • Create New...