Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

SEC Network: Levis vs Richardson on now


therealmjl
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Varking said:

Folks need to chill with the Cam comparisons because he’s going to be used differently in the pros. He’s not going to be treated like a battering ram. 

That's the problem - he can't throw the ball with any sort of consistency so he is going to have to rely on his legs and a designed running attack to have any sort of consistent success or impact in the NFL. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

For those of you who clearly never watched AR play football in an actual game but still insist he's the second coming of Cam Newton (looking at you @rippadonn) - SEC Network is airing his master class against Kentucky last season.

 

hint: it's terrible

You and TD can be mad all you want. They are enamored with AR.

It is what it is and I get it.

YOU don't.

Lol. The media said we HAVE TO pick my Brycie! 

Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

For those of you who clearly never watched AR play football in an actual game but still insist he's the second coming of Cam Newton (looking at you @rippadonn) - SEC Network is airing his master class against Kentucky last season.

 

hint: it's terrible

He won’t stop thinking we are getting anyone but Bryce until his name is called on Thursday for us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

That's the problem - he can't throw the ball with any sort of consistency so he is going to have to rely on his legs and a designed running attack to have any sort of consistent success or impact in the NFL. 

I believe he’s going to surprise folks in the NFL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Cam had an offensive line, Marvin Harrison, and Steve Smith in their prime, and Olsen / Shockey Cam would've thrown 45 TD every year with 4,500 pass yards

You could give that to Richardson, Mac Jones, and many other QB's and they would still suck

Cam didn't run because he couldn't pass, he ran because he literally couldn't pass .. no protection or separation from WR's

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, FieldsOverTheField said:

If Cam had an offensive line, Marvin Harrison, and Steve Smith in their prime, and Olsen / Shockey Cam would've thrown 45 TD every year with 4,500 pass yards

You could give that to Richardson, Mac Jones, and many other QB's and they would still suck

Cam didn't run because he couldn't pass, he ran because he literally couldn't pass .. no protection or separation from WR's

This is a ridiculous take. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, therealmjl said:

That's the problem - he can't throw the ball with any sort of consistency so he is going to have to rely on his legs and a designed running attack to have any sort of consistent success or impact in the NFL. 

To me he’s Cam without the killer instinct. Cam just had that eye for the big play to mask his below average accuracy. AR looks the part but he’ll need to learn how to stand in the pocket and pass at a decent level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...