Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If we could only win one...


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

...of the remaining four games, which one would you choose.

I'm guessing most would go with ruining the Saints perfect season, but someone else could conceivably do that before us. For the purpose of argument let's say the perfect season is no longer in play.

Is it still the Saints? There's plenty of hate for the Patriots. And how about winning a prime time showcase and beating Favre? The Giants, outside of revenge for last year, not so much.

So would everyone still pick the Saints or anyone going a different route?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Saints assuming they are 15-0 when we play them... we would go down in history as the spoilers of the Saints perfect season.... MUUUUHAHAHAHAHA!

If you can't have a good season yourself, then the next best thing is to find a way to ruin the season of a division rival!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the Saints is tempting....to pick. But Dallas could end there perfect streak also....

I gotta go w/ the Patriots at NE. I hate the Patriots. That win would be more impressive desipite the Saints being a better team. We know NO and always play them well....we are probably suppose to give them a good game regardless of how bad we are (at least those who follow the NFCS will execpt a good game).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the Saints are undefeated, I'd rather them stay undefeated (provided our season is completely done). Wouldn't you rather it be the Saints who have the most recent undefeated season over the Patriots?

And I'm going with the Patriots if we can only win one more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...