Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Potential Quarterbacks Available (Thought Hurney could use a Hand)

jramsey4

By jramsey4,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

jramsey4 Newbie

jramsey4

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Culpepper I'd have to think about. As a stopgap, maybe. Though in fairness, he looked pretty bad the last time he was a full time starter.

Had a bum Knee. Just food for thought. I think Culpepper needs the right tools around him to succeed I think we are built for Culpepper actually. Good running game, one of the best deep threats in the game, and a solid D behind him. It gets you thinking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jpniner Newbie

jpniner

Posted
Posted

What brings you to this conclusion? If you offered a 5th or 6th for him I'm sure they'd take it. They (along with it seems everyone else) firmly believe Freeman is the answer. This makes Johnson expendable.

correct, got my Tampa QB names mixed up.

Last time we took a reject QB within our division we got stuck with Delhomme. On other hand I'd love to have Schaub about now

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jramsey4 Newbie

jramsey4

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I like how he threw a sh*tfit when they told him at the last minute that Stafford would be able to play on Thanksgiving.

Wouldn't you if you had been practicing with the ones all week and on gameday they sit you? I mean he needs to control when he does it but I'd be just as pissed if that happened to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
scpanther22 Experienced

scpanther22

Posted
Posted

What brings you to this conclusion? If you offered a 5th or 6th for him I'm sure they'd take it. They (along with it seems everyone else) firmly believe Freeman is the answer. This makes Johnson expendable.

No that makes Josh Johnson there future backup.Thats what they always wanted.Plus they wont trade him to a rival

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jramsey4 Newbie

jramsey4

Posted
  • Author
Posted

No that makes Josh Johnson there future backup.Thats what they always wanted.Plus they wont trade him to a rival

You might be right but if the right player or pick was offered I'm sure they'd take it. It just depends on what he is worth to our FO. I would offer a 5th for him or a depth player (don't know who they'd want) for him but not much more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lout Newbie

Lout

Posted
Posted

I love how everyone mentioned in this thread ain't worth a damn. Give me Matt Moore over any of them.

My sediments exactly.. I'll take Moore, and try to draft a future QB. It is near impossible to get a franchise QB in FA or via trade.. Cutler, Schaub, and Favre are the only one's I can think of in the past 20 years. Those odds are a lot worse than finding one in the draft..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • rayzor
      Our guys working their azz's off to be the winners they know they are!!

      By rayzor · Posted

      Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Rocky Davis
      NHL Draft 2025

      By Rocky Davis · Posted

      Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...