Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Realistic QB draft candidates: Hiller, Skelton and Perrilloux.


top dawg

Recommended Posts

There are a few diamonds in the rough in every draft class. Teams just have to be lucky enough to find the right ones. Here are three NFL prospects at QB that may be available. I have given you a loose, nutshell of a synopsis. Do your own research on them and see what you think. Perhaps a few of you already know a little something about these guys and can add some perspective.

Ryan Perrilloux:

Somewhat of a troubled history, including being sent packing from LSU, but has shown steady improvement on and off the field at Jacksonville State. He has thrown for impressive yardage, is mobile and has the highest passer rating out of any NFL prospect at the moment.

John Skelton:

Fordham's offensive machine has excellent size and strength, and has shined against inferior talent. Great pocket presence and accurate. It is Fordham, however, so there are questions as to whether his success will translate at the pro level.

Tim Hiller:

Has a cannon, good size, and accurate, though there are questions about his short passing game. Can put good touch on the ball. There are questions about whether he can succeed with inferior talent (but to me that's pretty stupid considering he'd be coming to the NFL). If he's still available, he would probably be my pick at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

take it from an LSU fan; Perrilloux is a first class piece of sh it. Why are you focusing on division 1AA talent?

Nothing inherently wrong with division 1AA talent. Just looking at the top QB prospects out of the class. The Golden Calf of Bristol and others will be gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

guys ---- please stop panicking about the draft ..... as it stands now we are giving san fran our pick which will be between 7 and 14.......that means our 2nd round pick will be between 39 and 46......lots of good, good talent will be available.. look at who needs QBs ---- not cleve, tb, det, san fran, chi . or kc so that leaves wash, buff, stl, oak............i think we will still be able to get a QB in round 2.

ha -- maybe somebody will be crazy enough to want peppers and we can pick up a couple extra picks (very doubtful tho')

Link to comment
Share on other sites

guys ---- please stop panicking about the draft ..... as it stands now we are giving san fran our pick which will be between 7 and 14.......that means our 2nd round pick will be between 39 and 46......lots of good, good talent will be available.. look at who needs QBs ---- not cleve, tb, det, san fran, chi . or kc so that leaves wash, buff, stl, oak............i think we will still be able to get a QB in round 2.

ha -- maybe somebody will be crazy enough to want peppers and we can pick up a couple extra picks (very doubtful tho')

These guys will be our main competition for a QB.

Bills

Jags

Raiders

Skins

Vikings

Rams

Seahawks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These guys will be our main competition for a QB.

Bills

Jags

Raiders

Skins

Vikings

Rams

Seahawks

I don't really see why the Jags, Skins, Vikings and Seahawks are on this list. The Vikings will more than likely give T-Jax another shot, the Jags have Garrard who has been a more than serviceable starter and have more glaring needs, Jason Campbell is not the Skins problem and the Seahawks have Hasslebeck and have much more glaring needs.

The only way the Jags take a QB is if they get pressured in to taking The Golden Calf of Bristol and the Raiders may not even be looking for a QB if Gradkowski continues to play the way he does.

All that being said, we still won't be drafting a QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Saw this show up in my new feed. Nice to see a couple of our rookies making it into the top 5 so far, even if it is a pff measure... From https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-top-15-rookies-week-9-2025 ... 4. TE Mitchell Evans, Carolina Panthers (78.7) Evans struggled in the Panthers’ tight win over the Packers, finishing with a 41.8 PFF overall grade — third worst among tight ends this week. He was not targeted in the game and played only one snap in pass protection. He did log 15 run-blocking snaps, and although he earned a 68.9 PFF run-blocking grade in zone looks (seven snaps), his 39.0 mark in gap schemes (second worst for the week) dragged him down to a 46.6 PFF run-blocking grade overall — sixth worst for the week. Despite seeing zero targets over his past two games, Evans still leads the Carolina tight end group with a 74.3 PFF receiving grade. He has caught all nine of his targets for 90 yards, six first downs and two touchdowns. Evans also leads the Panthers’ tight end group in PFF run-blocking grade (72.2). He has recorded a 20.5% positive play rate across 175 snaps.  5. WR Tetairoa McMillan, Carolina Panthers (78.6) McMillan had a better day against the Packers, recording four catches for 46 yards. Most of that production came in the first quarter via two 16-yard catches — one of which he snatched from Carrington Valentine’s hands, who was in perfect position to break up the pass. McMillan accounted for three first downs on the day, although Green Bay was able to limit his impact after the catch, holding him to 0.8 yards after the catch per reception. McMillan now has 41 catches for 558 yards — a top-15 mark. He is also tied for second with 19 explosive gains of 15-plus yards. Three of McMillan’s catches against the Packers came between the numbers, bringing him to 22 for 318 yards and 19 first downs (tied for second most) this season. He owns a 26.1% threat rate and a 76.6 PFF receiving grade between the numbers. He also ranks in the top 10 in explosive gains (10) and yards after the catch per reception (5.5) within that area of the field. 
    • At least we don't need to hear overreacting about towels ...
    • Actually there is, try being a Charlotte Hornets fan. I mean the team fuging moved at its peak and hasn't recovered since and that was 25 years ago
×
×
  • Create New...