Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pssssst.......

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Gerry Green Veteran

Gerry Green

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, CRA said:

they did go full rebuild. 

New HC, new OC, new DC, all new schemes.  They traded away CMC and DJ Moore for draft picks.  We are starting a rookie QB.  We got a bunch of rentals and band aids all over the roster. 

the ONE thing they didn't do was trade Burns.  That's it.  And they probably should of.  And they still possibly could this season.  But that one decision doesn't somehow not make a rebuild a rebuild.  Nor does Frank saying standard PR jargon to a fanbase that hasn't seen anything in a half decade about wanting to win in the process. 

 

Since the advent of FA roster churn is the norm. You make it sound like we are the first team to even have roster churn. And we still have the majority of last years starters.

 

A Rookie QB is going to have to learn his WRs whether they have been here for years, or for months.

 

If Bryce even sniffs the ROY, we are fighting for the Playoffs. 

 

And thinking that replacing Burns is as easy as drafting another DE/OLB, you are dreaming. If it was that easy, every team would be chuck full of pass rushers. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

 

Since the advent of FA roster churn is the norm. You make it sound like we are the first team to even have roster churn. And we still have the majority of last years starters.

 

 

again, rebuilds don't exist....given the new definition being applied by the "we aren't in a rebuild, we are in win now mode" crowd. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PNW_PantherMan
      This has to be bitached about, those biased refs

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

    • TD alt
      DJ Moore trade talk

      By TD alt · Posted

      I mean, if Moore really wants out, then it would behoove the Bears to make it happen sooner than later. X is a lot younger and cheaper, and may be a better fit for Johnson's musings than a disgruntled, unnecessary, overpaid vet. If they can dump his salary and maybe get a fourth or so in return, it may be worth it to them. As for development, I'm not concerned. You're talking about a seeming bust, a day three guy and a UDFA. They are developing relative to their ceilings. I doubt any of them will ever command the coverage, money, or the respect that Moore has acquired. He's a tier above them. Yes, even X. 
    • ImfromClayton
      OK, now it's time to discuss a couple of yesterday's problems. Let's talk "Evero."

      By ImfromClayton · Posted

      IMO, if Ceedee plays against us, the game probably goes the other way. Same with Tyreek Hill and the Dolphins. Our team just isn't designed to beat teams with two high level receivers like that. But when you look at the league, how many teams really have two guys of that caliber?  There's nothing wrong with defensive adjustments, but sometimes I think a lot of fans want Evero to call a different play like a game on madden, and defensive football just isn't like that. That said, I thought we did a much better job this season against the Cowboys of flipping Jaycee and at least making them work for it, opposed to last season when they literally just lined CeeDee up on the other side of the field every single snap.  For us to just straight up switch to consistent man coverage, or a different zone, or whatever, we likely would consistently need different personnel on the field. Doing it a few times a game is a gamble and can work, but if we consistently run man coverage against the Cowboys, eventually a RB is going to beat a linebacker, or something of that nature with our personnel. Part of the reason Evero likes this scheme is that, while we have our defaults and presets, what we do is very multiple, and you can do a lot of different things pre and post snap. We are a challenging defense to read. But as you said, if guys are getting beat, it doesn't really matter what you call. 
×
×
  • Create New...