Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade speculation: Hunter Renfrow


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

No more in season trades at this point. Polish the turd we currently have and quit trying to add more corn kernels to it.

Just fuging draft some actually talented WR's in an offseason for fug's sake.

Terrace Marshall Jr and Jonathan Mingo are *extremely* talented WR’s and are coming from elite WR college programs.

They just need to perform.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, HardcoreHokie said:

Terrace Marshall Jr and Jonathan Mingo are *extremely* talented WR’s and are coming from elite WR college programs.

They just need to perform.

TMJ is a flat out bust, IMO. 

Mingo I still have some hopes for.

Being successful at WR in the NFL is about the ability to get separation. There are multiple ways to skin that cat but the bottom line is we don't really have any of those guys on the team other than Chark. That is a big problem. That also means the FO is not evaluating that position well at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

Ole Miss an elite WR program?  

AJ Brown and DK Metcalf are pretty damn good. That’s who Johnathan Mingo practiced with every day.  Ole Miss certainly has been doing well with WR’s lately.

And my quote also included LSU (you left that out) which is arguably the best program for receivers the past decade.  Terrace Marshall Jr played with some greats and I personally think he’ll develop into a good pro.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I don't disagree but if you can't get separation then it will never matter if you can or can't.

Hence why I made that statement. You need to be able to get separation to be an effective weapon in the current NFL. 

Understood though it isn't always on the player. Sometimes it's scheme (like with Joe Brady) other times it can even be the quarterback.

Mind you, I wouldn't put it on Young for us, but I'm sure you remember how Michael Vick's Falcon receivers were terrible...until someone else started throwing them the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Understood though it isn't always on the player. Sometimes it's scheme (like with Joe Brady) other times it can even be the quarterback.

Mind you, I wouldn't put it on Young for us, but I'm sure you remember how Michael Vick's Falcon receivers were terrible...until someone else started throwing them the ball.

I don't think it's an accident that the only player we had getting open with any sort of consistency in Game 1 was Theilen. 

We have 16 games left so I hope they can prove me wrong but right now this WR corps probably strikes fear in basically no NFL defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I don't think it's an accident that the only player we had getting open with any sort of consistency in Game 1 was Theilen. 

We have 16 games left so I hope they can prove me wrong but right now this WR corps probably strikes fear in basically no NFL defense.

Well, given the other choices were a rookie and a guy who's still a question mark... 😕

Maybe Chark makes a difference.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...