Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

For the Anti-Tankers: Can you provide a legitimate reason that this team should not have tanked last year?


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Varking said:

Flores was fired, thus his lawsuit, so again any smart coach has no incentive to lose games. 

When you ultimately get fired for losing games. 

Hard to justify firing a winning coach. And likewise much more easier to get another job. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Varking said:

hahahaha people still using this article about a failed lawsuit from a disgruntled coach who was simply an awful coach and tried to use this as an excuse to why he was so awful.

"they told me to lose!!!"

tanking is the biggest myth in sports and the only people who believe it also believe the WWE is still real.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Pantherxtreme said:

Flores was fired, thus his lawsuit, so again any smart coach has no incentive to lose games. 

When you ultimately get fired for losing games. 

Hard to justify firing a winning coach. And likewise much more easier to get another job. 

He wasn’t the only one apparently. If you were wining you wouldn’t tank. If the season is clearly lost or you are out of the playoff hunt, that’s when you make weird decisions like the Eagles did that got Peterson fired a few years ago. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GOAT said:

hahahaha people still using this article about a failed lawsuit from a disgruntled coach who was simply an awful coach and tried to use this as an excuse to why he was so awful.

"they told me to lose!!!"

tanking is the biggest myth in sports and the only people who believe it also believe the WWE is still real.

 

Remember when the Eagles benched their QB to see what they had in a third stringer? And the players spoke out against it after the game? And the coach got fired after that? That’s tanking. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Varking said:

Remember when the Eagles benched their QB to see what they had in a third stringer? And the players spoke out against it after the game? And the coach got fired after that? That’s tanking. 

which year are you referring to? that is not tanking. evaluating other players is not tanking. get a grip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not in same league. Caldwell just hit a 10.00 on the RAS. 2nd out of 3830 from 1987 onward.  https://x.com/MathBomb/status/2027885023387349047 Yeah I mean Louis had a sub 9.00 RAS. Still very very good, no doubt. Louis is small, no 2 ways about it. He is likely a sub package lb in nickel packages or specialized WLB. Be fine ST gunner to start for sure. 6 foot flat and 220lb is pushing it for a starting LB. At 10 to 20lbs less than the other LBs he'd better be closer to the top in most timed drills. He's gonna be challenged when some of the wrs in the class can matchup bigger stronger faster, much less TE in the run game.  Yeah instinct matter and he has them, but that size is a massive red flag compared to many of the other LBS in this class.    Rodriguez is the LB that really climbed this week from a pure grit guy to great flash with athleticism people wrote off cause he was a QB at first at UVA. 18.4mph in the backpedal. Production the last 2 years were great. I'd be thrilled with him as the future mike.   Hill likely moved out of 51 and into the top 45 picks ( Ravens at 45 I can't imagine don't bite if he makes it there). Honestly Hill imo is a 1st rounder and I'd be ok with him as he fits the MLB we have missed the last few years. People would crow it's a reach but he's top 30 all-time I'm RAS for a LB at 9.9+ . Plus he was big time in big games when he was healthy. And that br a big check: meds. 
    • Miller, Melo, Coby, Moose, and Bridges all on the floor at the same time must be a nightmare for defenses lol. Switch one out for Kon and still a nightmare. Coby really does bring a true 6th man value and looks like he could start if Melo was out after only a few games of getting his feet wet. 
×
×
  • Create New...