Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tedd Ginn Jr. may be available


PuntJake

Recommended Posts

according to ESPN the dolphins might be letting him go at the end of the season. I think he'd be a huge upgrade at #3 with real potential to develop into a #2.

EDIT TO ADD STATS:

Career stats:

Ginn: 3 years:

125 receptions 1644 yards 13.2 avg. 5 TD's 3324 yards on kick returns with 2 TD's and 1 TD on punt return

Jarret: 3 seasons:

28 receptions for 320 yards and 0 TD's. 0 kick off or punt returns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ginn is essentially Desmond Howard. If what you want is a guy who can be a game changer on special teams, that he gives you. And for what it's worth, Desmond Howard helped the Packers to a Super Bowl win.

If you want him as a receiver though - which is what he wants to be - and you pay him accordingly, you're taking a chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Correct this logic I might if it meant taking his guaranteed money now and spread it over 3 years (2026-2028) and maybe add $6m.  I am not sure you can do that, or that he would do it, but it would be a way for him to extend his career and bank accounts and we would be getting him for $6m for 2 years (if healthy), basically, since his entire salary is guaranteed now.  If not, we lose an additional $6m spread over 2 years.  So let's say his guaranteed $$ for 2026 is $18m.  Give him a $24m contract ($8m per) through 2028.  Worst case:  We get $10m in cap relief now and create $3m dead cap for 2 years (2027-8).   Best case?  We get cap relief now and a good/decent guard/tackle for 2 years (2027-2028) and the total salary per year when he is active would be $12m if you don't count any money for the season he cannot play.  That is a good value, and we'd basically be getting a 50% discount rate.  Since we have so much guaranteed now, extending him is not as crazy as it seems.   Something has to be wrong with this logic...      
    • I don't disagree about Nikishin's potential availability, but Hamilton as a replacement? Not an upgrade in my book.
×
×
  • Create New...