Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The protypical Panthers WR

unicar15

By unicar15,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

unicar15 Experienced

unicar15

Posted
Posted

Every single WR we have brought in here year in and year out are your prototypical "big bodied" WRs. Dwayne Jarrett, Rod Gardner, DJ Hackett, Drew Carter and the list goes on. Why haven't we targeted guys with the same frame and style of play as Steve Smith? Why don't we ever go after the guy who is 5'9" and a punt return specialist?

The Eagles got Desean Jackson last year and he worked out great. They followed last year's draft with Jeremy Maclin (essentially a Jackson clone) because they knew that it had worked the year before. It just seems like instead of going with what works for us we go with the norm and it never works. Go out and get the lightening quick punt returner/receiver this year and maybe we can turn him into the next Steve Smith. Receivers in today's game don't have to be 6'0 tall in order to be good. Give me a team full of Steve Smiths, Wes Welkers, Desean Jacksons any day of the week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
guyinchesapeake Newbie

guyinchesapeake

Posted
Posted

Actually, I miss Drew Carter. He showed some true promise. I hated that he got away. I think our 'devotion' to big WRs has more to do with Moose than Smitty, in that big WRs who can go up and win the battle for the ball is the expectation. I agree though, a good WR is a good WR, period, regardless of size. The thing is, with jake at QB, we may never know who else can be a good WR, seeing how he only sees his primary receiver on any given play. And that's either Smitty or Moose, with Smitty getting most of those looks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
magnus Rookie

magnus

Posted
Posted

Carter/Hackett aren't the same type receiver. Tall, but thin.

Wouldn't be terrible to have that type guy. I don't care who it is, but we need a deep threat that's not Smith and a slot guy. And Moose. I'd like those first two attributes to be in one guy, but if not, we need the slot guy more.

I can't imagine this team without Muhammad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
unicar15 Experienced

unicar15

Posted
  • Author
Posted

You need two different types of receivers. If you have two speed guys or two possession receivers it hurts your offense.

Tell that to Philly - Two best receiver are speedsters..their possession WR is a TE

Tell that to SD - Two best receivers are possession...don't have a speedster

Tell that to NYG - Two best receivers are possession..don't have a speedster

You don't HAVE to have any specific type of receiver which is my point. Philly has one of the most explosive offenses this year and their possession receiver is their TE.

Teams do what works for them. Rivers likes throwing to big targets that don't necessarily need a lot of space to operate.

When you think about it, if you have a guy like Steve Smith who can operate in space like a little WR but can also go up and get the ball like a big WR then why do you "need" to get the exact opposite of him?

The bottom line is that we don't "need" a big possession WR to line up opposite of Smitty. What we need is a guy that can create separation and then catch the ball when it is on target. We have never had a guy like that to play opposite of Steve Smith.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Udogg Enthusiast

Udogg

Posted
Posted

The bottom line is that we don't "need" a big possession WR to line up opposite of Smitty. What we need is a guy that can create separation and then catch the ball when it is on target. We have never had a guy like that to play opposite of Steve Smith.

This ^^^^

Someone who has makes people scared to bring that other safety in the box. Thats all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jrock3016 Newbie

Jrock3016

Posted
Posted

Tell that to Philly - Two best receiver are speedsters..their possession WR is a TE

Tell that to SD - Two best receivers are possession...don't have a speedster

Tell that to NYG - Two best receivers are possession..don't have a speedster

You don't HAVE to have any specific type of receiver which is my point. Philly has one of the most explosive offenses this year and their possession receiver is their TE.

Teams do what works for them. Rivers likes throwing to big targets that don't necessarily need a lot of space to operate.

When you think about it, if you have a guy like Steve Smith who can operate in space like a little WR but can also go up and get the ball like a big WR then why do you "need" to get the exact opposite of him?

The bottom line is that we don't "need" a big possession WR to line up opposite of Smitty. What we need is a guy that can create separation and then catch the ball when it is on target. We have never had a guy like that to play opposite of Steve Smith.

How about a speed guy and a possession receiver that can run block well works well with our system so that's what they want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • R0CKnR0LLA
      A lookback at Morgan's first draft

      By R0CKnR0LLA · Posted

      If you need someone to run your multi-billion dollar business, maaayyyybe don't hire a guy whose previous work experience includes repeated blows to the head and literal brain damage but IDK.
    • Saca312
      Do You Agree With These Excuses?

      By Saca312 · Posted

      Extrapolate that with every QB for that matter. I guarantee you there's quite a bit of missed opportunities and yards left on the field for everyone. Many NFL QBs deal with WRs not putting in A+ effort, subpar o-line play and other deficiencies. The great ones are able to rise above these issues and create opportunities for plays. Guys like Josh Allen and Patrick Mahomes can both play in and out of structure, as well as find ways to get yards when things break down and mask mistakes by throwing guys open, creating opportunities from nothing, etc. Bryce Young has only shown he's able to make things happen when the rest of the team picks up his slack. Very rarely does he create those opportunities himself. When this is a consistent pattern year after year with Bryce where he shows up lackluster, it's a concern. This is year three and he should be elevating the team as a first overall pick this franchise traded up for.  He was far from elevating anyone against JAX. In fact, he needed others to elevate and create for him. Excuses may be fine for a rookie, but this is year three for the first overall pick. Not looking good so far.
    • Aussie Tank
      Do You Agree With These Excuses?

      By Aussie Tank · Posted

      I think the worst issue is coaching. Countless bad snaps, XL not getting his feet in or trying on runs plays, our centre being down field when he didn't need to be. All seem to be from poor coaching for me. I believe Canales is to soft to rip the players a new one when the fug up. Plus I honestly believe that Canales is slow getting his plays in giving Bryce less time to diagnose and adjust to the defence. Don't worry I could of head butted Bryce for that fumble and the 4th down throw aways but the other plays are explainable to me 
×
×
  • Create New...