Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

38/21


Frank9999
 Share

Recommended Posts

Was the panthers/vikings time of possession. 
This was all Bryce executing too since the run game was nonexistent. Bryce wasn’t as bad as he's being made out. The fumble was terrible, but so many missed opportunities too. I think it was actually impressive that Bryce was able to execute quickly and maintain possession. Yes we need to score but I think there was still positive here that is being overlooked. 

Edited by Frank9999
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, therealmjl said:

I mean he threw a TD pass that Ian dirt bike Thomas tried to catch with his helmet.

If Thomas catches that, the story is a little different.

Let's not forget he threw what absolutely should've been a pick six a few plays before this happened if we're viewing the full scope of whataboutism.

  • Pie 1
  • The D 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Unfortunately you don't get any points for TOP. You have to move the ball into FG range or across the goal line. Two things we failed to do.

Look man I know. All I am saying is the TOP was very positive and it was basically all Bryce. Of course not scoring kind of makes it all for nothing, but its still a positive sign that Bryce was able to have so much TOP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Penalties were killer. We were looking at 1st and goal at the 6, but a bad penalty on the LT, then an awful play call to go back another few yards. Then the fumble, huge change of momentum there. Should have been up 16 to 7 at minimum there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Let's not forget he threw what absolutely should've been a pick six a few plays before this happened if we're viewing the full scope of whataboutism.

Should it have been though? Not many DL are going to catch that ball. It was a bad play but…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Let's not forget he threw what absolutely should've been a pick six a few plays before this happened if we're viewing the full scope of whataboutism.

That wouldn’t have been a pick 6, but I agree it should have been picked.

I’m not as down on Bryce as everyone else. I thought he executed what he was given Sunday. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Let's not forget he threw what absolutely should've been a pick six a few plays before this happened if we're viewing the full scope of whataboutism.

This is true, but like that was a pull back and throw play that just didn't work out. It was a good play by a defender that probably new it was coming. If he is bumped off at all, that was a TD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • What are these "good feelings" OP mentions? When has anyone ever felt good about BY play year over year?  If you do wtf kind of football are you cool with watching or supporting?
    • Here is what I heard and I should know--when you all were dating, I was studying how coaches communicate to reporters.  Who's laughing now? First, what we know:  He does not have any serious talks (that we know of) to extend him at this point.   Second, Canales says that we do not need to be changing things just to change them.  I thought that was an interesting statement. Why would a QB do that?  What is the reason?   In that answer, you find the source of DC's frustration. Finally, the reality of Bryce has to be setting in.  Bryce's agent is likely contacting Dan Morgan about the fifth year or second contract.  For Bryce to be effective, is he really going to need an elite TE, a $100m offensive line, two thousand-yard rushers, a stable full of WRs, and a defense that keeps him from playing from behind (making him one dimensional and a thrower?)   If Bryce wants $50m, we simply can't afford the supporting cast.
×
×
  • Create New...