Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Too little Too late firing Crossman. April has been nabbed


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

While I am just speculating here, this last second move by Fox may be a sign of things to come. April has been available for two weeks and it was widespread news that he has been interviewing with other teams. Yet Fox waits until Wed. to finally give him a call and fire Crossman too little too late. Fox is a lame duck coach right now and most have agreed that he was pissed with Richardson's choice to not extend him and be free to look for other jobs. I think this is an example of a lackadaisical attitude he is assuming and it could spell big problems for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would April be interested in a position with a coach who has a likely chance of being gone after next year? Maybe he wants to stay in the NE. Everyone makes assumptions it's becuase of some Fox consipiracy to doom the team or becuase he's incompentant. Think about it from April's vantage point as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would April be interested in a position with a coach who has a likely chance of being gone after next year? Maybe he wants to stay in the NE. Everyone makes assumptions it's becuase of some Fox consipiracy to doom the team or becuase he's incompentant. Think about it from April's vantage point as well.
fox called him....after he signed the deal with the eagles. fox waited until too late. fox spent too long trying to make a decision on crossman...something that should have been made well before the season ended. something that could have been decided on in the past two weeks easily.

would we have gotten april? who knows? the fact is we can never know because fox waited to pull the plug.....again.

about that one year deal...that would be the same in most situations. who is going to give anyone a deal longer than a year when the owners are looking at a lockout in a year? very little reason to believe the panthers would give him less of a deal than anyone else.

there could be a whole slew of reasons why he wouldn't come here but none of that matters now. he won't be here. thanks, fox, for waiting until too late to make the move you should have.

so....now we deal with the next best available options. off to mr. scot's thread we go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys are clueless if you think we could have nabbed April. Why do you think one of the top asst coaches would takea job on a staff where the HC only has 1 year on his contract.
wouldn't say clueless...unrealistic? maybe. unlikely? probably. point is that fox waited too long to find out one way or another. you don't know unless you try and fox waited to long to give the panthers a shot.

kind of a resounding theme throughout his tenure here. if he has an emotional attachment to someone, he's going to give that more weight in his decisions than the greater good of the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys are clueless if you think we could have nabbed April. Why do you think one of the top asst coaches would takea job on a staff where the HC only has 1 year on his contract.

on top of that.....why would he want to take a job where the cabinet is so bare. There is not much to work with right now in Carolina.....Philly has got some great talent for ST right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I am just speculating here, this last second move by Fox may be a sign of things to come. April has been available for two weeks and it was widespread news that he has been interviewing with other teams. Yet Fox waits until Wed. to finally give him a call and fire Crossman too little too late. Fox is a lame duck coach right now and most have agreed that he was pissed with Richardson's choice to not extend him and be free to look for other jobs. I think this is an example of a lackadaisical attitude he is assuming and it could spell big problems for us.

To me, this screams of a JR move. I find it very coincidental that the same week in which Fox meets with Richardson, Crossman (who Fox is very close with) is let go. I'm also speculating, but it just feels like this move was initiated by JR, not Fox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...