Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fox's Worst vs Best


bLACKpANTHER

Recommended Posts

John Fox's record is 71-57. Good enough in the NFL for a .555 win percentage. We all know how good Fox can be:

No Team ever quit on him

when healthy- he can take a team deep into the playoffs

Fox's motto- Protect the football and grind it out to have a chance to win in the 4th

But how often does that work? What about the times Fox doesn't have a chance to win it in the 4th? When his motto doesnt play out well- just how BAD is Fox's Worst??

Heres the list of games that Fox's Panthers over the years have lost by More that 14 points.

10/20/02 at Atlanta L 0-30

11/24/02 ATLANTA L 0-41

12/15/02 at Pittsburgh L 14-30

01/06/02 NEW ENGLAND L 6-38

10/19/03 TENNESSEE L 17-37

10/03/04 ATLANTA L 10-27

10/17/04 at Philadelphia L 8-30

10/24/04 SAN DIEGO L 6-17

09/10/06 ATLANTA L 6-20

10/29/06 DALLAS L 14-35

12/17/06 PITTSBURGH L 3-37

01/22/06 at Seattle (NFC Championship Game) L 14-34

10/28/07 INDIANAPOLIS L 7-31

11/25/07 NEW ORLEANS L 6-31

12/09/07 at Jacksonville L 6-37

10/12/08 at Tampa Bay L 3-27

11/23/08 at Atlanta L 28-45

01/10/09 ARIZONA (NFC Divisional Playoffs) L 13-33

09/13/09 PHILADELPHIA L 10-38

19 losses total. Out of the 57- thats .333%

so just about 1/3 of every loss is a Bashing under Fox, some are massacres.. a game where winning or losing in the 4th Qtr is not an option- Losing is a given!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, 109-19 is his record for applying his philosiphy. That equals a 85% chance of it working. I'm not sure what you were trying to prove, if anything, but to me thats a really good % over a 8 year span.

im in the party of "Screw Cowher & Bring Fox Back".. i just put it in the light of the Fox haters so more would read/coment..

so continue....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

J

Heres the list of games that Fox's Panthers over the years have lost by More that 14 points.

10/24/04 SAN DIEGO L 6-17

09/10/06 ATLANTA L 6-20

17 out of 57 losses by more than 14 points = 0.298. Fewer than 3 of every 10 losses are by more than 14 points. Or 13% of all games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
    • rippadonn likes him.  That might be a red flag.... https://x.com/rippadonn/status/2042310653176594854
×
×
  • Create New...