Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tim Tebow Superbowl Commercial getting some bad press


STIFFPAWED

Recommended Posts

http://jay-mariotti.fanhouse.com/2010/01/27/super-bowl-no-place-for-tebows-views/

Say what you want about his quarterbacking skills, but it seems as though no one seems to think it's OK for a someone to pay out $3.1 million dollars for 30 seconds and have their views on subjects such as this represented by a famous collegiate QB. Especially during the Superbowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I don't feel like I'm very preachy about it, but I do stand up for what I believe. Unfortunately in today's society, not many athletes seem to do that. I always stand for something."

Wow does anyone else think that comes across as extremely arrogant and superior?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow does anyone else think that comes across as extremely arrogant and superior?

I don't know about all that.

Immature stance? Perhaps. From what I understand, the ad is his mom talking about how she was advised by dr's to abort. She didn't and here is Timmy.

She made a CHOICE and the outcome worked out pretty well.

The pro choice crowd doesn't like it but the ad is NOT slamming the abortion crowd, simply, again, from what I have gathered, a positive message of a womans choice in that scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know about all that.

Immature stance? Perhaps. From what I understand, the ad is his mom talking about how she was advised by dr's to abort. She didn't and here is Timmy.

She made a CHOICE and the outcome worked out pretty well.

The pro choice crowd doesn't like it but the ad is NOT slamming the abortion crowd, simply, again, from what I have gathered, a positive message of a womans choice in that scenario.

So are you trying to tell us that this is a pro choice ad? HAHAHA

Here's the deal, she HAD the choice. She has the choice. She will have the choice.

The ad is about trying to convince at risk pregnant women that hey, maybe they could live through a pregnancy that their doctor does not recommend they try to do! Just forget what your doctor tells you and go for it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ad is about trying to convince at risk pregnant women that hey, maybe they could live through a pregnancy that their doctor does not recommend they try to do! Just forget what your doctor tells you and go for it!

Their bodies, their choice.

If they want to go through a risky pregnancy, then they need to know that it's okay for them to do so.

Harrah's commercials and NC Lottery commercials encourage me in the same way to blow all of my money in casinos and on scratch off cards. Should they be taken off the air?

Tell me, why do you hate liberty so much?

Yep, this should clear this thread into the tinderbox in 5,4,3,2...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Say the same thing here I said elsewhere...

How many people on here could even tell you what any Panther player's political views are?

Character issues matter. Political beliefs don't. I'm not going to pick what team I cheer for based on who has the most conservatives. Nor do I think any other fan - conservative or liberal - would choose on such criteria.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So someone is spending 3.1 million dollars to remind people that they don't have to listen to their doctors. That's great.

You are the one jumping too conclusions. She is highlighting the outcome of a good choice.

So, in the middle of this so called choice facade, the doctor, NOT the woman, is the decider?

Are dr's infallable and never wrong? Of course not. Are there some bad examples of women who did not listen to their doc and the outcomes were bad? Yep. But those women had that choice.

So fake outrage is exclusive to what liberals do wrong? ha ha ha ha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So someone is spending 3.1 million dollars to remind people that they don't have to listen to their doctors. That's great.

The message of risking a life to save a life isn't a noble cause to you?

Remind me not to hang off of any cliffs near you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's my biggest concern with making him the 2C.  You split up the Aho Jarvis bromance that accounted for a lot of points.  If Jarvis excels as a C, it could help the team even more though.
    • The Saints being that high is the one that killed me. Chris Olave might not know his name at this point, Shaheed is coming off injury as well, so 31 year old Brandin Cooks might be your best WR...coming off a 260 yard season over 10 games. Kamara is Kamara, but didn't have 1,000 yards last year and is about to turn 30.  Toss in the fact that Taysom Hill may be the best QB on the team and I truly don't understand Barnwell's thoughts beside seeing the names "Olave" and "Kamara" and going yep, that sounds better than "Chuba" and "Thielen". 
    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
×
×
  • Create New...