Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

*?


Sapper

Recommended Posts

If Freeney doesn't play at all in the big game, will anyone view a Saints' victory with an asterisk?

I know it is the NFL and injuries are common, but I was interested to hear what others thought.

I thought that McCoy going down in the MNC gave Alabama an unfair asterisk but I am not sure what I would think about Freeney.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Freeney doesn't play at all in the big game, will anyone view a Saints' victory with an asterisk?

I know it is the NFL and injuries are common, but I was interested to hear what others thought.

I thought that McCoy going down in the MNC gave Alabama an unfair asterisk but I am not sure what I would think about Freeney.

Look, I hate the Saints as much as everybody else but no team is completely healthy this time of year. There's no asterisks on wins due to injuries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as I hate the saints and never want to see them win a superbowl. No, there should definitely not be an asterisk.

This is a team sport. Injuries happen; people go down. The only reason there should ever be an asterisk is when there is a reasonable dispute in regards to the rules of the game. Such as: The refs admittedly blew a call that could have changed the outcome of the game, a player was caught cheating, a ref/player/coach bet on the game, a coaching staff was caught video taping hand signals during the game, etc.

Injuries are just a part of the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • There is a Grand Canyon-sized chasm between your opinion and the opinions of most former player hockey guys who do this for a living.
    • I can only imagine the **** eating grins on the committee right now. "Oh, Bama didn't deserve it? Oh, Miami didn't deserve it? Suck it, haters!" lol
    • To say that, is gaslighting, because it isn’t true. I mean, maybe one or two people do that but it isn’t the predominant behavior. Even Frank has given him credit. I think particularly the Rams game. A couple of glowing posts.   I know I have. Gotta be honest about it because if you aren’t it undermines what else you say.  But the degree of how far I go with credit, in terms of it being a projection of future performance? Not very far. Acknowledge it, but require more of it. There is a lot of bad play to offset.    I tried to remain passive while the last 9 games (post ankle injury) played out. It is just really hard when the lows won’t go away. I failed. As high as a couple of those highs were, there isn’t enough.    I know it is premature to just say I want to move on, made my decision after 6 of those games ended up pretty much really good or not good enough, but I have had enough of being patient and letting him show the reality either way.  So in my view, he Could still validate himself to a decent degree if he smokes the last three starts. But also in my view I don’t expect to see it. Maybe one more high quality start, would be my expectation. So yes he could still somehow justify having the job next year. If that happened I still wouldn’t have much faith given the last three years and all that has transpired. Again, there is a lot of bad play to offset. 
×
×
  • Create New...