Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Worst movie of the decade...


Zod

Recommended Posts

Here are the official nominees with the total of razzies they have won.

WORST PICTURE of the DECADE

"Battlefield Earth" (2000) Nominated for 10 RAZZIES / "Winner" of 8 (including worst drama of our first 25 years)

"Freddy Got Fingered" (2001) Nominated for 9 RAZZIES / "Winner" of 5

"Gigli" (2003) Nominated for 10 RAZZIES® / "Winner" of 7 (including worst comedy of our first 25 years)

"I Know Who Killed Me" (2007) Nominated for 9 RAZZIES / "Winner" of 8

"Swept Away" (2002) Nominated for 9 RAZZIES / "Winner" of 6

Can't say I have seen any of these, but I did see about 4 minutes of Battlefield Earth and had to turn it off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You all have it wrong: It's Superbabies:Baby Geniuses 2. The movie was so bad, the razzies had to reject it from competition.

If you don't believe me, just watch it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3It9mQ179EA&feature=related

see how long you can last watching this piece of poo, you won't make it past part 3/9, i guarantee it

oh yeah, it was directed by the guy who made A CHRISTMAS STORY. wtf?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...