Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers scoring offense (Tepper history)


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

I did this really quick but I think it correct.   I don't think it makes any grand point given there are so many variables but here are the points per game by HC/OC duo of the Tepper era. 

Wilks/McAdoo - 22 points per game

Ron/Turner - 22 points per game 

Rhule/Brady - 21 points per game

Rhule/McAdoo - 18 points per game

Frank/Brown - 17 points per game 

Fewell/Turner - 15 points per game

Rhule/Nixon - 13 points per game

basically Frank/Brown are outperforming part of the interim crowd at this rate. 

*title says scoring offense but it's just the PPG # being used for clarification. 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the point here to place Reich & Co performance against peers then I'd like to see this adjusted for defensive scores.  Mostly because the Reich & Co sample size is so small that two defensive scores makes a significant difference, almost 2 ppg.

It's almost an exercise in futility though as we all know it's about as bad as it can be.

Edited by Newtcase
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Newtcase said:

If the point here to place Reich & Co performance against peers then I'd like to see this adjusted for defensive scores.  Mostly because the Reich & Co sample size is so small that two defensive scores makes a significant difference, almost 2 ppg.

It's almost an exercise in futility though as we all know it's about as bad as it can be.

yeah, that's why I said it doesn't mean all that much.  It's just numbers.  And like the Fewell stretch is only 4 games.   Just overall way too many variables.  

But I think it is safe to say, Ron and even Rhule lead some more successful teams and offense than Frank Reich has to date.  And Frank is the "offensive" guy.  I think the reason why is because they had essentially nothing to do with the offenses and Frank does. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CRA said:

yeah, that's why I said it doesn't mean all that much.  It's just numbers.  And like the Fewell stretch is only 4 games.   Just overall way too many variables.  

But I think it is safe to say, Ron and even Rhule lead some more successful teams and offense than Frank Reich has to date.  And Frank is the "offensive" guy.  I think the reason why is because they had essentially nothing to do with the offenses and Frank does. 

They also had CMC and Moore. Or Cam and CMC. The game plans have sucked and you've gotta respect throwing out plays that get yards, and stubbornly continuing to call plays that don't, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You don't have to go through every game and point it out as we are discussing his GWDs. You specifically called out that he had GWDs because he is the reason the team is always playing from behind. We looked at those eight games and only Miami stands out as one where he put the team in a hole to begin with. You've added the Atlanta game where the team didn't score a TD but only kicked field goals. You're not trying to change what we're discussing to fit your feelings re: Bryce. That's not necessary. We are discussing GWDs per the thread topic. We have also shown that your opinion that the team has had to always come back due to Bryce was proven to be false as was the claim that "minus one game" was his fault. Appealing to emotion afterwards by trying to broadly paint the rest of the losses in the same way just doesn't work. Where in the Hell did you get that the entire point is the suggestion that BY is more clutch than Jake and/or Cam? It's giving something to be positive about in that Bryce has shown the ability to comeback and win games despite the calamity that might have taken place to put them behind to begin with. How is that blasphemy?
    • His run blocking is making up for his negatives in pass blocking right now.  He’ll still have pass blocking hiccups, but if they think he’s a critical part to the locker room and team construction, you probably re-sign him and try not to overpay.
    • Callahan is gone McDaniel and Taylor are happening Stefanski is a growing possibility. I mean, they need to get an offense going eventually.  Could see Morris as a surprise one.
×
×
  • Create New...