Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers scoring offense (Tepper history)


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

I did this really quick but I think it correct.   I don't think it makes any grand point given there are so many variables but here are the points per game by HC/OC duo of the Tepper era. 

Wilks/McAdoo - 22 points per game

Ron/Turner - 22 points per game 

Rhule/Brady - 21 points per game

Rhule/McAdoo - 18 points per game

Frank/Brown - 17 points per game 

Fewell/Turner - 15 points per game

Rhule/Nixon - 13 points per game

basically Frank/Brown are outperforming part of the interim crowd at this rate. 

*title says scoring offense but it's just the PPG # being used for clarification. 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the point here to place Reich & Co performance against peers then I'd like to see this adjusted for defensive scores.  Mostly because the Reich & Co sample size is so small that two defensive scores makes a significant difference, almost 2 ppg.

It's almost an exercise in futility though as we all know it's about as bad as it can be.

Edited by Newtcase
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Newtcase said:

If the point here to place Reich & Co performance against peers then I'd like to see this adjusted for defensive scores.  Mostly because the Reich & Co sample size is so small that two defensive scores makes a significant difference, almost 2 ppg.

It's almost an exercise in futility though as we all know it's about as bad as it can be.

yeah, that's why I said it doesn't mean all that much.  It's just numbers.  And like the Fewell stretch is only 4 games.   Just overall way too many variables.  

But I think it is safe to say, Ron and even Rhule lead some more successful teams and offense than Frank Reich has to date.  And Frank is the "offensive" guy.  I think the reason why is because they had essentially nothing to do with the offenses and Frank does. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CRA said:

yeah, that's why I said it doesn't mean all that much.  It's just numbers.  And like the Fewell stretch is only 4 games.   Just overall way too many variables.  

But I think it is safe to say, Ron and even Rhule lead some more successful teams and offense than Frank Reich has to date.  And Frank is the "offensive" guy.  I think the reason why is because they had essentially nothing to do with the offenses and Frank does. 

They also had CMC and Moore. Or Cam and CMC. The game plans have sucked and you've gotta respect throwing out plays that get yards, and stubbornly continuing to call plays that don't, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • 3 years to figure it out and the answer has been the same every time.  Think they will try a different solution? Bryce and Andy lol. I hope so but it is hard to have any faith in them to do that.  The Cam stuff, I don’t think anyone is talking about that thinking he is a solution for 2026. Just wishing we had some of his ability at the position now. 
    • The time adjustment plus this weather might be the only leg up we get. Just run it 40 times between Rico and Chuba lol.   
    • My amateur opinion … It’s that footwork and his overall mechanics that stop him. Short sucks too but his accuracy and timing and velocity, all compromised by his technique.  Not enough natural arm strength there to overcome it. I am not sure what another year would do if he isn’t fixing that stuff. Or two years.  If he could have things straight and squared away he could maybe get enough out of his abilities to play consistently week to week.  He will still be limited by things like field vision and what someone pointed out this week that I had never noticed or considered - trajectory on really short near field throws like goal to go situations. They said the arc he needs to clear the d line guys is such a high angle that it is hard to get the ball back down soon enough. Which boy, that is a can of touch pass worms there if you think about it. Like shooting a basket where defenders can goal tend. You have to throw it so soft that defenders can close on it. Receivers would have to use their bodies to shield.   Then you are left with rolling out to see the field and get a lane, which shuts down half the the field and is easier to defend. It’s really tough. You go looking for negatives, or impediments, they are there to find. 
×
×
  • Create New...