Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers owner admits a three-way trade for the No. 1 pick was in place two days before it happened


TeppersEgos
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Why the hell we didnt simply stay where we were and see how the draft unfolded in real time is fuging criminal.  We panicked and overpaid for young.  That is clear as day now. 

After the carousel of QBs paraded in and out of here for 5 years and everyone bitching about needing a franchise QB now. They had to do something and made a ballsy move that doesn't look like its going to pan out with drafting the wrong dude. You're a pro at after the fact analysis...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Johnstonny said:

After the carousel of QBs paraded in and out of here for 5 years and everyone bitching about needing a franchise QB now. They had to do something and made a ballsy move that doesn't look like its going to pan out with drafting the wrong dude. You're a pro at after the fact analysis...

go back and read my posts, I was saying that all along

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Johnstonny said:

After the carousel of QBs paraded in and out of here for 5 years and everyone bitching about needing a franchise QB now. They had to do something and made a ballsy move that doesn't look like its going to pan out with drafting the wrong dude. You're a pro at after the fact analysis...

Making a ballsy move is the easy part.

There are people here who could make better personnel decisions than the meddling Tepper's. That's the issue and Mr. Tepper has been meddling all along. We have zero winning seasons to show for it.

But go off about that after the fact analysis. How those boots tasting?

Edited by frankw
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frankw said:

Making a ballsy move is the easy part.

There are a people here who could make better personnel decisions than the meddling Tepper's. That's the issue and Mr. Tepper has been meddling all along. We have zero winning seasons to show for it.

But go off about  that after the fact analysis. How those boots tasting?

totally agree on the tepp remark.... just saying damned if you do damned if you don't... and no...theres no one on this message board that could make better decisions..lol...unless John Harbaugh has an alias account...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Johnstonny said:

totally agree on the tepp remark.... just saying damned if you do damned if you don't... and no...theres no one on this message board that could make better decisions..lol...unless John Harbaugh has an alias account...

There's been several people on this message board that have been right more often on major decisions than the front office, and it was all called when it happened. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Johnstonny said:

totally agree on the tepp remark.... just saying damned if you do damned if you don't... and no...theres no one on this message board that could make better decisions..lol...unless John Harbaugh has an alias account...

Quite a few people here wanted and assumed the Panthers were all in for Stroud.

There's still time though. We'll see.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frankw said:

Quite a few people here wanted and assumed the Panthers were all in for Stroud.

There's still time though. We'll see.

My choice was stay at 9 and take AR, but once we moved to 1 it needed to be CJ. Reich was still the wrong choice as HC. I really wanted Steichen for offense or Ryans, if we went defensive HC. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...