Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 Mock Drafts


pantherj
 Share

Recommended Posts

it's funny how you go through phases (or at least i do) where i see this one guy and think "he really needs to be here" so he shows up consistently in mocks. i'm leaning that way with Pearsall. There's quite a few WRs i like and would be great with them coming here, but for about a week now Pearsall is that guy for me. I want us to double dip (at least) at WR and i don't really care which one it is that we pair with him, as long as we can manage to get him.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Martin said:

I would do Sweat instead of Wilson, but otherwise close to the ideal draft. I like the idea of Limmer getting a year or two behind Corbett and then taking over.

i hope Corbett can stay upright long enough and that he's good at the center thing. Limmer is one i wouldn't hate at OC. I think we've got a few decent options spread out through the draft. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rayzor said:

it's funny how you go through phases (or at least i do) where i see this one guy and think "he really needs to be here" so he shows up consistently in mocks. i'm leaning that way with Pearsall. There's quite a few WRs i like and would be great with them coming here, but for about a week now Pearsall is that guy for me. I want us to double dip (at least) at WR and i don't really care which one it is that we pair with him, as long as we can manage to get him.

I was all about JPJ at C for us (would still be my #1 pick, but I don’t think he’ll be there). But now I’m all about Sweat. Would make our D-Line amazing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Martin said:

I was all about JPJ at C for us (would still be my #1 pick, but I don’t think he’ll be there). But now I’m all about Sweat. Would make our D-Line amazing. 

that's kind of where my head is at now...the idea of Sweat on there with Robinson and Brown is just too awesome an idea.

and then you've got Clowney coming off the edge...yow!

i don't care who you put on the other side, damage would be done.  OLs won't be able to deal with a front 3 like that. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, rayzor said:

i hope Corbett can stay upright long enough and that he's good at the center thing. Limmer is one i wouldn't hate at OC. I think we've got a few decent options spread out through the draft. 

That's a dangerous gamble imo.  He's had very significant lower body injuries 2 seasons in a row and is an unknown at center. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Hoenheim said:

That's a dangerous gamble imo.  He's had very significant lower body injuries 2 seasons in a row and is an unknown at center. 

i don't like our chances when we gamble with poo like that.

as seriously as we have taken getting the interior OL right this year, you'd think we would take center more seriously. i have to imagine that we will be addressing it in the draft unless there's some OC FA gem they are waiting to hear about.

Could be we will try to draft one and if not then we'll look into some other FA options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Martin said:

I would do Sweat instead of Wilson, but otherwise close to the ideal draft. I like the idea of Limmer getting a year or two behind Corbett and then taking over.

I put Wilson there because I got a feeling that's what the Panthers will do at 39.  I've been on Wilson since Morgan was hired, he's a former ILB and I feel he wants to make his stamp there like Ron did with Kuechly. When Kuechly put his stamp of approval on him it all but sealed it for me.  I think his value is in the 3rd but he won't make it that long so I can see them picking him at 39.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

three recents. i'd be cool with any mix and matching of these three. leaning more on the AD/Pearsall combo than AD/McConkey... seems like getting similar players while allowing for another roster upgrade at the 39ish pick. Isaac, Sweat and Tampa could all come in and have an immediate impact on next year's team

PFN_Draft_result_1711638671857.thumb.png.b57a179ca0a8ec24ddff48ad522e651d.pngPFN_Draft_result_1711667626067.thumb.png.5e339e4574d747701cf6bea2d5144365.pngPFN_Draft_result_1711668548684.thumb.png.60af1c8ae9a76f1473fbd1b2946469be.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...