Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CFB conference championship games

LinvilleGorge

By LinvilleGorge,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, HardcoreHokie said:

FSU beat Florida and LSU (with Heisman favorite Jayden Daniels) and is undefeated.

Alabama needed a Hail Mary last week to beat 6-6 Auburn.  

Auburn lost the week before to New Mexico State.  At home.  By three touchdowns.

SEC baby.

FSU is basically not a top 15 team without their QB.

Florida? You mean 5-7 Florida? So that's the basis for thinking FSU is good?

Now I would have a different opinion if basically the FSU season wasn't over once they lost Jordan Travis.

INB4 30+ loss to whomever they play.

Edited by kungfoodude
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

I have no dog in the fight, but I think most of us forget that FSU still has their defense. And it's pretty good.

The committee should just troll us all and put Ohio St in. One loss, wasn't allowed to play in their title game, and it'd make the TX/GA/Bama argument moot lol.

It's a good defense but it isn't an elite defense, even by FSU standards. To overcome their lack of a QB, they will need truly elite defensive play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bear Hands Grand Master

Bear Hands

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

You can argue all you want that TX beat Bama ... but TX didn't beat GA. And yeah, Bama beat GA. They all have a claim. TX has the worst loss though. What a headache. I just don't see how you drop GA that far down in the rankings. I think TX and Bama get left out.

Yeah it's really just a headache haha. Alrighty here it is...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      This draft is 2023 all over again, it's not hard to see. QB's who don't grade out as high first round prospects while at the same time, the following draft class looks to be loaded with elite QB prospects. Drafting a QB just because you need one (or making a bad trade to make said draft pick), when there isn't one worthy of that draft pick, is how you ruin franchises, just look at us right now.  
    • Anybodyhome
      Cellphones

      By Anybodyhome · Posted

      I upgraded to the S24+ a few weeks back. Very happy with it. 
    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.   And yes, I've never said I'm not a T-Mac homer. But me being that doesn't change that he will be the highest graded offensive player in this year's draft, at a position we haven't been able to solve since we lost Smitty.  Taking him makes all the sense in the world, my bias aside.
×
×
  • Create New...