Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike Kaye on the path forward


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

JFC. This poo isn't rocket science. Hire an experienced team president who can help Tepper run the organization and act as a buffer between him and football operations. Then hire a GM who has a good resume with (and an actual role in) an organization known for building competitive rosters. Then have those two work together to find the best coaching candidate that they can work with to build a winning organization.

Just one example:

PR: Kevin Colbert
GM: Jon Ferrari
HC: Frank Smith

Tepper has really made this a WHOLE lot harder than it should be.

I'd prefer Will McClay as the GM, but if you're pulling somebody from the Eagles, I'd take Brandon Hunt.

Hunt was expected to be the heir apparent to Kevin Colbert in Pittsburgh, but the team gave the job to Omar Khan instead. Hunt left for the Eagles shortly thereafter. Given the Pittsburgh connection though, he would be known to Tepper.

There is also at least the possibility that given his prior connection, Hunt might have enough clout to stand up to Tepper if he has the spine to do so. In that situation, you don't necessarily need a team president like Colbert.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'd prefer Will McClay as the GM, but if you're pulling somebody from the Eagles, I'd take Brandon Hunt.

Hunt was expected to be the heir apparent to Kevin Colbert in Pittsburgh, but the team gave the job to Omar Khan instead. Hunt left for the Eagles shortly thereafter. Given the Pittsburgh connection though, he would be known to Tepper.

There is also at least the possibility that given his prior connection, Hunt might have enough clout to stand up to Tepper if he has the spine to do so. In that situation, you don't necessarily need a team president like Colbert.

I like McClay too. Just saying Tepper has made this whole process so much harder than it has to be by trying to constantly prove to everyone that he's the smartest guy in the room.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

I like McClay too. Just saying Tepper has made this whole process so much harder than it has to be by trying to constantly prove to everyone that he's the smartest guy in the room.

No argument, and that's part of the concern I posted a few minutes ago.

If the hole in game it really is to prove it he's the smartest guy in the room, we're pretty much sunk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Im really not understanding the frank smith angle here.

He's pretty highly spoken of by several sources.

Of course, so was Nathaniel Hackett, but hey... 😕

At least nobody can say Smith is benefiting from an Aaron Rodgers type quarterback.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

He's pretty highly spoken of by several sources.

Of course, so was Nathaniel Hackett, but hey... 😕

At least nobody can say Smith is benefiting from an Aaron Rodgers type quarterback.

He didnt create the offense, he doesnt call plays, he hasnt been a OC for even a year.   Just not seeing why he should be a hot commodity 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tbe said:

The team president thing just sounds like more cooks in the kitchen.

All of that should be the GMs job. If Scott can’t ‘build a program’ then he needs to go.

Tepper stays away and allows a GM+HC combo to build the team.

The biggest benefit to a team president is to pick the right GM. It also potentially opens the door to a wider tree for scouts, finances and contracts, front office people. Of course none of this really matters if Fitts stays. I don't trust the Teppers to keep their nose out of any of it far enough to not significantly interfere with building at least a mediocre franchise. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

He didnt create the offense, he doesnt call plays, he hasnt been a OC for even a year.   Just not seeing why he should be a hot commodity 

What gets talked about most is his intelligence and his skill set. 

And to be clear, two of the most successful head coaches in the league right now, Andy Reid and Dan Campbell, were never even coordinators.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

The biggest benefit to a team president is to pick the right GM. It also potentially opens the door to a wider tree for scouts, finances and contracts, front office people. Of course none of this really matters if Fitts stays. I don't trust the Teppers to keep their nose out of any of it far enough to not significantly interfere with building at least a mediocre franchise. 

With most NFL teams, the GM is basically king of everything, similar to what a college coach is at that level.

The 49ers do it a little differently. John Lynch is the GM and as such handles pretty much everything...except personnel. Adam Peters handles all the personnel matters.

I honestly kind of like that arrangement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

I like McClay too. Just saying Tepper has made this whole process so much harder than it has to be by trying to constantly prove to everyone that he's the smartest guy in the room.

Everything the organization does screams “we’re the smartest people in this league” and clearly their amongst the dumbest.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...