Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike Kaye on the path forward


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

JFC. This poo isn't rocket science. Hire an experienced team president who can help Tepper run the organization and act as a buffer between him and football operations. Then hire a GM who has a good resume with (and an actual role in) an organization known for building competitive rosters. Then have those two work together to find the best coaching candidate that they can work with to build a winning organization.

Just one example:

PR: Kevin Colbert
GM: Jon Ferrari
HC: Frank Smith

Tepper has really made this a WHOLE lot harder than it should be.

I'd prefer Will McClay as the GM, but if you're pulling somebody from the Eagles, I'd take Brandon Hunt.

Hunt was expected to be the heir apparent to Kevin Colbert in Pittsburgh, but the team gave the job to Omar Khan instead. Hunt left for the Eagles shortly thereafter. Given the Pittsburgh connection though, he would be known to Tepper.

There is also at least the possibility that given his prior connection, Hunt might have enough clout to stand up to Tepper if he has the spine to do so. In that situation, you don't necessarily need a team president like Colbert.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'd prefer Will McClay as the GM, but if you're pulling somebody from the Eagles, I'd take Brandon Hunt.

Hunt was expected to be the heir apparent to Kevin Colbert in Pittsburgh, but the team gave the job to Omar Khan instead. Hunt left for the Eagles shortly thereafter. Given the Pittsburgh connection though, he would be known to Tepper.

There is also at least the possibility that given his prior connection, Hunt might have enough clout to stand up to Tepper if he has the spine to do so. In that situation, you don't necessarily need a team president like Colbert.

I like McClay too. Just saying Tepper has made this whole process so much harder than it has to be by trying to constantly prove to everyone that he's the smartest guy in the room.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

I like McClay too. Just saying Tepper has made this whole process so much harder than it has to be by trying to constantly prove to everyone that he's the smartest guy in the room.

No argument, and that's part of the concern I posted a few minutes ago.

If the hole in game it really is to prove it he's the smartest guy in the room, we're pretty much sunk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Im really not understanding the frank smith angle here.

He's pretty highly spoken of by several sources.

Of course, so was Nathaniel Hackett, but hey... 😕

At least nobody can say Smith is benefiting from an Aaron Rodgers type quarterback.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

He's pretty highly spoken of by several sources.

Of course, so was Nathaniel Hackett, but hey... 😕

At least nobody can say Smith is benefiting from an Aaron Rodgers type quarterback.

He didnt create the offense, he doesnt call plays, he hasnt been a OC for even a year.   Just not seeing why he should be a hot commodity 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tbe said:

The team president thing just sounds like more cooks in the kitchen.

All of that should be the GMs job. If Scott can’t ‘build a program’ then he needs to go.

Tepper stays away and allows a GM+HC combo to build the team.

The biggest benefit to a team president is to pick the right GM. It also potentially opens the door to a wider tree for scouts, finances and contracts, front office people. Of course none of this really matters if Fitts stays. I don't trust the Teppers to keep their nose out of any of it far enough to not significantly interfere with building at least a mediocre franchise. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

He didnt create the offense, he doesnt call plays, he hasnt been a OC for even a year.   Just not seeing why he should be a hot commodity 

What gets talked about most is his intelligence and his skill set. 

And to be clear, two of the most successful head coaches in the league right now, Andy Reid and Dan Campbell, were never even coordinators.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

The biggest benefit to a team president is to pick the right GM. It also potentially opens the door to a wider tree for scouts, finances and contracts, front office people. Of course none of this really matters if Fitts stays. I don't trust the Teppers to keep their nose out of any of it far enough to not significantly interfere with building at least a mediocre franchise. 

With most NFL teams, the GM is basically king of everything, similar to what a college coach is at that level.

The 49ers do it a little differently. John Lynch is the GM and as such handles pretty much everything...except personnel. Adam Peters handles all the personnel matters.

I honestly kind of like that arrangement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

I like McClay too. Just saying Tepper has made this whole process so much harder than it has to be by trying to constantly prove to everyone that he's the smartest guy in the room.

Everything the organization does screams “we’re the smartest people in this league” and clearly their amongst the dumbest.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you are an athlete or former athlete (myself?  Cornhole 2021-present; Disc Golf 2013-got a mega blister and had to retire; speed walking--every black Friday at Walmart 2003-2009) you know what it is to lose confidence.  Self-inflicted or not (in my view, a lot of 2023 was coaching and a lot of 2024 was confidence), he has confidence now. How fragile is it?  I think the light is on, the game slowed down, and he is ready to do his thing.  He seems to be "mobile in the pocket" instead of "running scared."   Last year, there were times when AT was out, Johnson gone, and all he really had was XL and Coker--a raw rookie with upside and an UDFA rookie.  TE was rarely a viable option. It reminded me of Benjamin and Funchess.   Moore had to step up.  This season, Bryce has weapons.  I expect XL to improve.  I expect TMac to help tremendously, and I think Coker will be solid.  Renfrow?  Horn?  bonuses.    
    • His points are valid.  However, it seems a bit based on past performance and fails to take into consideration trends and conditions that might suggest growth in 2025.   For one, he breaks the team down by position and ranks them separately.  I guess that is a fair way to do it, but they are dependent upon each other. Last year, our DL sucked.  That impacts the rest of the defense.  With no internal pressure, the QBs simply step up to avoid the Edge rush.  I would have suggested that the internal DL is now featuring pass rushers and large people who can collapse the pocket.  Secondly, the LBs were not protected very well in 2024.  It is hard to see the holes and step up when a guard is in your earhole a second after the snap.  Finally, the defensive backs will be forced to make fewer tackles and they will be better in pass protection with a new and improved DL.    Canales made an interesting comment the other day, and I (from the outside looking in) feel the same way:  (paraphrasing) "I have never seen a better group of rookies."   I think the biggest concern is the learning curve.  How long before these rookies are ready?   I am bullish on this team.  I think they win 3 of their first 4 and get confident.  The get the fans behind them.  From there, they win 6 of the remaining 13.  If they stay injury free, they have an outside shot at the NFC south.     
    • Biiiiiig eyeroll on this.  First, Look at historical stats of the most recent historical great DBs.  I plucked 3, Revis, Sherman, and Norman (cuzz he was our guy).  Combined post age 30, there are TWO pro bowls between those 3 and wanna get this...ZERO seasons with 16 games started.  ALL missed time.  It is RARE that Corners survive that long in the NFL and its about time we started recognizing this fact.  Jaycee is a good bet because it hasnt been anything seriously devastating injury wise, and with his sample size he could and should be an incredible piece for the panthers through age 30. Jaire kinda flops on the other side, hes 28...so hes under 30, but he wants his payday before it comes up, hes also been injury prone lately.  Bulk of the contract will be on opposite side of 30.  Will both of these guys help us be better in 2026?  SURE!  No doubt, but the question is, will these guys help us past 2026...not sure. The investment isnt worth the risk, nor would the ROI be anywhere close to worth it.  Neither guy is moving us from a 6-8 win team to a 8-10 team, period. My point is we're in this state a 6-8 win team IMO and he projects us as  a 4-6 win team.  EVEN if we think Jaire or Ramsey will make us a 6-8 win team, it in NO WAY is worth the money or capital to move that much just to suck kinda less.  
×
×
  • Create New...