Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

sTEPP Back


Tbe
 Share

Recommended Posts

I will absolutely not be buying anything Panthers related that I am not contractually obligated to purchasing. Not a damn thing.

I think attendance will speak louder than anything else. It's not even worth underselling at this point, 2 tickets to a game don't look to be able to cover a meal at McDs for 2 now.

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Not technically Panthers related.

More "screw you, Tepper" related 😕

"screw you, Tepper" is free and how is telling Tepper to stop being an embarrassment not Panther related? It's not Panther sponsored sure. 

I am not wearing anything Panther adjacent until Tepper gets his head out of his arse and stops the clown show he brought to town. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Waldo said:

"screw you, Tepper" is free and how is telling Tepper to stop being an embarrassment not Panther related? It's not Panther sponsored sure. 

I am not wearing anything Panther adjacent until Tepper gets his head out of his arse and stops the clown show he brought to town. 

The money isn't going to the Panthers.

I mean hell, if I had a custom T-shirt made that said "David Tepper is a b-tch" you could technically call that spending money on something Panthers related but it wouldn't exactly constitute supporting the team.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The money isn't going to the Panthers.

I mean hell, if I had a custom T-shirt made that said "David Tepper is a b-tch" you could technically call that spending money on something Panthers related but it wouldn't exactly constitute supporting the team.

Maybe if you could sell 100 billion of those shirts, you can have more money than Tepper and buy the team from him!

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Waldo said:

"screw you, Tepper" is free and how is telling Tepper to stop being an embarrassment not Panther related? It's not Panther sponsored sure. 

I am not wearing anything Panther adjacent until Tepper gets his head out of his arse and stops the clown show he brought to town. 

 

Teacher teacher you forgot to assign homework for the weekend 

 

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The money isn't going to the Panthers.

I mean hell, if I had a custom T-shirt made that said "David Tepper is a b-tch" you could technically call that spending money on something Panthers related but it wouldn't exactly constitute supporting the team.

I get that, it's why I use the word related and not official.  

It still has the Panther's colors and is about the team so how is it not Panther related gear? Am I missing something? Is that the same colors for the soccer team (serious question, don't know or care before this convo). Hell the knockoff gear is Panther related and not official team stuff and that is the same category, even if they are trying to look official. It's all semantics but I don't see how what I said doesn't hold up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Waldo said:

If you keep being bad I will assign you to watch this weekend's game young man...

My children’s Grandmother bought them all Brice Young jerseys for Christmas. I asked her what they did to get on Santa’s naughty list because those are expensive lumps of coal

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 4Corners said:

My children’s Grandmother bought them all Brice Young jerseys for Christmas. I asked her what they did to get on Santa’s naughty list because those are expensive lumps of coal

I hope they were on a big sale. That is brutal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Waldo said:

I hope they were on a big sale. That is brutal

I’m not even kidding. She should have consulted with me first. It’s a waste of money and I don’t want my kids to get picked on for wearing those. Might as well just bought a white tee and wrote “kick me” on the back. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

I’m not even kidding. She should have consulted with me first. It’s a waste of money and I don’t want my kids to get picked on for wearing those. Might as well just bought a white tee and wrote “kick me” on the back. 

It's brutal she dropped that much cash on things that will not be received well. That's better than your wife buying you a lemon of a car for Christmas with a monthly payment attached but damn that stinks. I hope she can return them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Like I said before, I don't get the "only as a UDFA" sentiment, you have to keep following your board. Now if Pavia falls to what amounts to the supplementary UDFA section of the board, that's great, but if he's sitting at the top when you're picking day three (yes, I can't see him being drafted before day three), then you pull the trigger. Rounds 5-7 don't generally provide keepers anyway, you can use them for players that you want to take a closer look at that you may be able to develop.  Pavia may not translate to the pros. Nobody would bet anything of value on it. But, he was highly productive in college due to his play extension abilities, "body torque" mechanics on short and intermediate throws, and good accuracy on said throws. And, he has that dawg in him to be sure.  All that being said, Drew Allar will probably be able to be had on day three, and if it comes down to it--due to nothing but my prejudice against short, weak-armed QBs--I'd pick Allar.
    • Yeah, receivers contracts are crazy, and it's probably not going to change. You almost have to take your swings--keep some picks at WR churning between rounds one through three in order to keep your costs down and give you options at contract time. Creating that value surplus appears to be more important at WR and all the premium positions than getting a non-premium position player who generally are just easier to replace as it pertains to value. The holy grail is to hit on a premium position late, but due to the gradually declining hit rate on days one and two that drops off a cliff day three, you basically have to get lucky. 
    • Very interesting indeed. It did make my head swim more. It said a lot, but it still didn't give any concrete answers. Kinda makes me want to pivot back towards a premium position though...
×
×
  • Create New...