Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dear David Tepper


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, RayRedd said:

PSL-owners are the true bedrock of the "fan base" of this organization -- and they have proven ain't going anywhere👊.

Carry on with the irrelevant and ineffective whinging... 🤘

 

Oh… you are going to be in a world of surprised when games get blacked out next year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, RayRedd said:

PSL-owners are the true bedrock of the "fan base" of this organization -- and they have proven ain't going anywhere👊.

Carry on with the irrelevant and ineffective whinging... 🤘

 

Judging from some of the home games the PSL owners aren’t showing up and a good number of them post on this forum about not renewing their seats. After this season I can’t imagine many will be renewing. Knowing Tepper he will sell them to 3rd party resellers just to continue claiming the games are a “sellout”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, hepcat said:

Judging from some of the home games the PSL owners aren’t showing up and a good number of them post on this forum about not renewing their seats. After this season I can’t imagine many will be renewing. Knowing Tepper he will sell them to 3rd party resellers just to continue claiming the games are a “sellout”

You're correct that a lot of people sell on the secondary market and don't attend the game/s -- but they aren't selling their PSL's -- there's a BIG difference.

The number of PSL listings is at 2-year lows, which makes sense, think about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Lame Duck said:

Tepper had beyond screwed the pooch here.  He will either need to sell the team or move the team.  He pissed off both states.

I would not be surprised if he did move the team. However, the way it's going that would be no great loss.

I have been a devoted, diehard Panthers fan and P.S.L. holder since day one. I would never in my wildest dreams think I would or could have such negative feelings pertaining to the Carolina Panthers that I presently have.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, KatsAzz said:

I have been a devoted, diehard Panthers fan and P.S.L. holder since day one. I would never in my wildest dreams think I would or could have such negative feelings pertaining to the Carolina Panthers that I presently have.

Do you have your PSL's listed for sale?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, RayRedd said:

You're correct that a lot of people sell on the secondary market and don't attend the game/s -- but they aren't selling their PSL's -- there's a BIG difference.

The number of PSL listings is at 2-year lows, which makes sense, think about it.

I know two people personally who are not renewing their PSLs. One is retiring and leaving Charlotte so it makes sense, the other no longer enjoys going to the games

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...