Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Quality of BBQ in the USA


jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

I’ll add a bit more.  I met the owner back in 2013 when Saucemans was just starting and he explained to me he used a lot of Asians spices infused with regular BBQ seasonings and it gave unique flavors that just out of this world so I begun experimenting and got into BBQing.

I do mystery meats at my place for fun for anyone who dares and I’d smoke ostrich, deer, buffalo, snake, bear, gator, etc. and let folks guess.  Gator got to be the hardest meat not to screw up.  It should be deep fried really but there’s a way to make decent burnt ends out of it if you do it right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Cullenator said:

Beef isnt BBQ. 

It can be very delicious smoked meat. I had some in brisket in Austin once that was out of this world amazing.

 

 

But it aint BBQ

Brisket is BBQ.  I just googled it after your post and every website says pulled pork and brisket are the original bbq.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

There are two different definitions of BBQ, one a verb and one a noun.

The Verb, to cook outdoor or on a grill.  This definition is not used in the Southeast.

The Noun, pork cooked on an fire or grill or some other method that can be used outdoors.  Cooked with one of several different sauces or baste, the best of which is a mixture of tomato sauce and vinegar.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...