Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Quality of BBQ in the USA


jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

I’ll add a bit more.  I met the owner back in 2013 when Saucemans was just starting and he explained to me he used a lot of Asians spices infused with regular BBQ seasonings and it gave unique flavors that just out of this world so I begun experimenting and got into BBQing.

I do mystery meats at my place for fun for anyone who dares and I’d smoke ostrich, deer, buffalo, snake, bear, gator, etc. and let folks guess.  Gator got to be the hardest meat not to screw up.  It should be deep fried really but there’s a way to make decent burnt ends out of it if you do it right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Cullenator said:

Beef isnt BBQ. 

It can be very delicious smoked meat. I had some in brisket in Austin once that was out of this world amazing.

 

 

But it aint BBQ

Brisket is BBQ.  I just googled it after your post and every website says pulled pork and brisket are the original bbq.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

There are two different definitions of BBQ, one a verb and one a noun.

The Verb, to cook outdoor or on a grill.  This definition is not used in the Southeast.

The Noun, pork cooked on an fire or grill or some other method that can be used outdoors.  Cooked with one of several different sauces or baste, the best of which is a mixture of tomato sauce and vinegar.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...