Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rams will take Sam Bradford?.


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

I know its not popular..But I think its a good ideal.

ESPN's Adam Schefter told a St. Louis radio station he is "willing to take all bets" on his prediction that the Rams will select Oklahoma QB Sam Bradford with the No. 1 overall pick.

Schefter admits that he has not spoken to the Rams about the issue, but he insists he doesn't need to because he's "heard enough other things" from people around the league that he considers it a lock. Schefter also "promises" that Bradford is a top-5 player in this draft. The Rams are also reluctant to pay the going rate at No. 1 for a defensive player. If Schefter is correct, the Lions are sitting pretty at No. 2 with their choice of Ndamukong Suh and Gerald McCoy.

http://www.rotoworld.com/Content/playerpages/player_main.aspx?sport=NFL&id=5161

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it really doesn't make any sense if that rumored trade with Tampa Bay was legit.

Neither Detroit or Tampa will be drafting a QB. The Rams could trade down with the bucs, clean up, and still get their man.

One problem with that... NOBODY wants to give out the ridiculous contract that will go to the number one overall selection, so I doubt anyone will want to give up a lot, if anything, to move up to the top spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One problem with that... NOBODY wants to give out the ridiculous contract that will go to the number one overall selection, so I doubt anyone will want to give up a lot, if anything, to move up to the top spot.

number 1 contracts for DT (which the bucs were supposedly going to take) aren't insane like they are QBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Schefter admits that he has not spoken to the Rams about the issue"

Let me go ahead and bold it for fun.

"Schefter admits that he has not spoken to the Rams about the issue"

laugh out LOUD

It amazes me that people like Schefter get paid to sit around and pull stories out of their asses!

How hard is it to make some phone calls to the front office or hit up some sources that hopefully you have inside each franchise if you have a job like Schefter's?

Gotta love the offseason!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It amazes me that people like Schefter get paid to sit around and pull stories out of their asses!

How hard is it to make some phone calls to the front office or hit up some sources that hopefully you have inside each franchise if you have a job like Schefter's?

Gotta love the offseason!

Schefter knows his stuff.People just dont know what speculation means.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's my biggest concern with making him the 2C.  You split up the Aho Jarvis bromance that accounted for a lot of points.  If Jarvis excels as a C, it could help the team even more though.
    • The Saints being that high is the one that killed me. Chris Olave might not know his name at this point, Shaheed is coming off injury as well, so 31 year old Brandin Cooks might be your best WR...coming off a 260 yard season over 10 games. Kamara is Kamara, but didn't have 1,000 yards last year and is about to turn 30.  Toss in the fact that Taysom Hill may be the best QB on the team and I truly don't understand Barnwell's thoughts beside seeing the names "Olave" and "Kamara" and going yep, that sounds better than "Chuba" and "Thielen". 
    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
×
×
  • Create New...