Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canales and Morgan to report to Tepper


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

23 hours ago, Panthers8969 said:

Boo hoo they have to report to the guy who signs their checks. Here’s a quick exercise to check if someone has to report to someone: can they be fired? If so, who can fire them? Tepper owns the team, no poo people report to him. Welcome to the real world 

i mean yea ultimately but Tepper has ZERO business interfering with their day to day work

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, SOJA said:
23 hours ago, Panthers8969 said:

Boo hoo they have to report to the guy who signs their checks. Here’s a quick exercise to check if someone has to report to someone: can they be fired? If so, who can fire them? Tepper owns the team, no poo people report to him. Welcome to the real world 

i mean yea ultimately but Tepper has ZERO business interfering with their day to day work

How many direct reports do you manage?

Edited by RayRedd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bandu said:

 just doesn't make sense because I thought that the head coach reported to the GM.

 

So in your dream scenario would the Head Ball Coach ever even speak with the Owner?

Or, in banking parlance, would there be a inviolable Chinese Wall between the Owner and the Head Ball Coach whereby they would never interact, at all, in the entirety of the Head Ball Coach's contract?

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/26/2024 at 7:52 AM, JawnyBlaze said:

Who are they supposed to report to, Roger Goodell?  Jfc wait til the season starts at least before judging the new guys

No, No... don't you understand? "The world according to the Huddle". Of all the teams in the league, Carolina is the ONLY one where the GM and HC are accountable to the owner.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, RayRedd said:

 

So in your dream scenario would the Head Ball Coach ever even speak with the Owner?

Or, in banking parlance, would there be a inviolable Chinese Wall between the Owner and the Head Ball Coach whereby they would never interact, at all, in the entirety of the Head Ball Coach's contract?

the GM typically has the power to hire or fire a coach , make trades , negotiate contracts , free agent acquisitions, & of course leads the scouting department.

so with that said please elaborate what the Head Ball Coach as you like to put it needs to report directly the  owner  ?

Edited by bandu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, RayRedd said:

 

So in your dream scenario would the Head Ball Coach ever even speak with the Owner?

Or, in banking parlance, would there be a inviolable Chinese Wall between the Owner and the Head Ball Coach whereby they would never interact, at all, in the entirety of the Head Ball Coach's contract?

& please show me while your at it where I suggested that  the head coach should never speak with the owner ?

let's admit it you know & I know you are being irrational to say the least

& BTW have a nice day...just saying

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, bandu said:

the GM typically has the power to hire or fire a coach , make trades , negotiate contracts , free agent acquisitions, & of course leads the scouting department.

so with that said please elaborate what the Head Ball Coach as you like to put it needs to report directly the  owner  ?

"...typically..."

"Typically" the 199th pick in the NFL draft doesn't start at QB in the Super Bowl -- screw "typically'.

The cited report is pure speculation and nothing more.  

That said, the beauty of being the owner is you get to call all the shots -- Tepper is the owner, it's his call.  

Which owner do you feel is behaving in a manner that you approve of and want to align yourself with?  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, bandu said:

& please show me while your at it where I suggested that  the head coach should never speak with the owner ?

It's 100% clear that's exactly how you feel.  In your perfect world the owner would simply turn up in the owner's suite on game-day and nothing more, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
    • The Giants, Cardinals  and Dolphins should have moved on, but they didn't and ended up cutting their QB early into a monster second contract and had to eat a TON of dead cap money.
×
×
  • Create New...