Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Moore responds to Panthers' offer

Dpantherman

By Dpantherman,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Jangler Newbie

Jangler

Posted
Posted

This kid is the Anti-Christ to Peppers.

How refreshing.

Yeah for us.

That's what I was thinking, a player that is happy with a tender. And wanting to play for that team. This will give him a lot of confidence going into TC. I just hope Matt and DJ are hanging out together over the summer working out and practicing together and getting a connection going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DaveThePanther2008 Grand Master

DaveThePanther2008

Posted
Posted

this

Is It? I hope we keep him but this could have been done for draft picks. Maybe the FO thinks they can get back in the 1st round with him. Get up there and take Bradford or something.

After all Hurney and Fox went after McCown because they liked him so much. Could be we resign McCown and him and Jake fight it out.

Take the 1st and 3rd and really do some damage in this deep draft.

Just so everyone knows. I WANT MORE TO BE OUR NUMBER 1 but offering him the high tender could be for other reasons than keeping him.

Go Panthers

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DaveThePanther2008 Grand Master

DaveThePanther2008

Posted
Posted

I don't think anyone would have given up more than a second for him. At the very least, it doesn't make sense to give him the highest offer possible if they're just trying to get back in the first round of the draft.

1st and a 3rd.

He is more of a sure thing then any QB in the draft. 6-2 as a starter against mostly playoff teams, He would be worth a 1st. Especially if that team had more than one 1st round pick.

I hope we match it but the possibilities are endless. What is St Louis wanted him... Would you take their #1 Pick overall? and a third? It would be hard to say no to. Especially since Fox things Jake can win the starting QB spot back.

Go Panthers

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MadHatter Rookie

MadHatter

Posted
Posted

1st and a 3rd.

He is more of a sure thing then any QB in the draft. 6-2 as a starter against mostly playoff teams, He would be worth a 1st. Especially if that team had more than one 1st round pick.

I hope we match it but the possibilities are endless. What is St Louis wanted him... Would you take their #1 Pick overall? and a third? It would be hard to say no to. Especially since Fox things Jake can win the starting QB spot back.

Go Panthers

Absolutely you would take it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Panthers' content round up

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...