Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade Deadline

Chief_Chokeaho

By Chief_Chokeaho,
in Carolina Hurricanes

 Share

Recommended Posts

KillerKat Grand Master

KillerKat

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, CarolinaWillRise said:

Anything else is icing on the cake, Jarvis and Necas are pacing 30 goal seasons if svechnikov would be as well if he'd been healthy all season, Turbo is resurgent... 

 

This season we have a legit chance to have 4-6 30 goal guys....

Aho 35-40g player

Guentzel 35-40 g player

Svechnikov 30 goal player 

Necas 30 goal player

Jarvis 30 goal player 

Turbo 30 g pace

We have more guys performing as scorers this year than any year except 2006

 

 

Im just thinking playoffs. Everyone seems to change during that time at some point which leads to our exit.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarolinaWillRise Proficient

CarolinaWillRise

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

Im just thinking playoffs. Everyone seems to change during that time at some point which leads to our exit.

I agree with that some of it has to do with the tighter style of hockey that's played in the playoffs..... Some of it IMO Is that almost all of our top talent for scoring is still VERY YOUNG (looking at you Marty Necas) he and Jarvis need to keep up the performances....

 

Adding a guy like Guentzel increases our Cup chances by a lot IMO he's CLUTCH in the playoffs....

 

I wanted him last year because I watched the entire Pitt-NYR series last season and Trouba knocked Crosby out in game 1..... Guentzel Carried them to a game 7 single handily 8g 8a....

 

Playoffs alone are why this was a much better outcome than Mier last season.

Edited by CarolinaWillRise
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Harbingers Grand Master

Harbingers

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, GamecockSmitty4 said:

What are we thinking, are we done? I wish there was a 2C out there we could make a play on but so far Lindholm is the only decent C I’ve seen available. 

No thank you to Lindholm. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Harbingers Grand Master

Harbingers

Posted
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, GamecockSmitty4 said:

What are we thinking, are we done? I wish there was a 2C out there we could make a play on but so far Lindholm is the only decent C I’ve seen available. 

Haven’t read it yet but here’s the days 50 round up. 5 hours to go. 
 

That being said. There isn’t really a 2C upgrade left on the market at this point. 

Edited by Harbingers
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthers Fan 69 Grand Master

Panthers Fan 69

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, GamecockSmitty4 said:

What are we thinking, are we done? I wish there was a 2C out there we could make a play on but so far Lindholm is the only decent C I’ve seen available. 

Word this morning is they are still trying to make a deal for scoring help. Buch and Vat are apparently still in the conversation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Harbingers Grand Master

Harbingers

Posted
Posted
Just now, MillionDollarCam said:

Would like: Buchnevich, Vatrano, Toffoli, Eberle, Granlund (only decent center left)

Would take: Pacioretty

Has Max even been producing this year after return from injury? Haven’t been following him. Heard the panthers are angling for him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GamecockSmitty4 Community Regular

GamecockSmitty4

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

Word this morning is they are still trying to make a deal for scoring help. Buch and Vat are apparently still in the conversation. 

Either of those guys would be great. Vatrano costs less in cap space and both have an additional year. Would give us 3 legitimate lines with Drury and Staal being the weakest links. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Good film breakdown of Young. Good and bad. Film examples

      By CRA · Posted

      Bryce isn't a risk-taking gunslinger.  That's just QB DNA.  No one has ever said that is what we were drafting when we went that route.  That's my point.  That's not Bryce. Can you make Alex Smith throw deep? Sure.  He will occasionally.  In the reverse, can you ask Brett Favre to just take the easy layups? Sure.  He can in moments.  But in the end, they are what they are.  as I have said, Canales probably could win more games with PJ Walker.  And Bryce is a better overall QB than PJ.  PJ Walker would also have much worse games mixed in that Bryce would.   
    • CPF4LIFE
      Good film breakdown of Young. Good and bad. Film examples

      By CPF4LIFE · Posted

      From what i see, Canales offense requires a QB that is willing to take chances to maximize the offense. XL is also the kind of receiver that needs a qb to be risky to bring out his full potential. Its just a matter of if Bryce is gonna be that QB.
    • CRA
      Good film breakdown of Young. Good and bad. Film examples

      By CRA · Posted

      Baker just played how Baker played.... everywhere but here. He is a risk taking gunslinger.  Always has been.  And last year was asked to be what he was.   Geno Smith was the best deep ball passer in the NFL his comeback season.  Wasn't even close that year.  Again, that's the type passer Canales has always been around in the offenses he has been part of.  The pass game that compliments the stubborn run is the deep chunk play pass game.   And that was his first investment with XL.  My continued point, is the same as going into last season.  It's a bad marriage going in.  The QB doesn't fit the scheme.  Again.  Carrol/Fox/Ron....all paired up their boring football with risk taking QBs.  And again, I'm fine if that is where we are going.  It's not my preference but that's not my argument.  I'm saying if we are doing that, we need a QB that matches it.     
×
×
  • Create New...