Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Moore named the starter


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

This is a good thing. He knows going in the job is his to lose, you see how he handles it, if his work habits improve, if he becomes good leadership material for the team.

If not, we look elsewhere next season (provided there is a next season) and he's free to move on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Means we're likely only in the market for a backup in free agency or the draft.

I think we pull in a backup vet (re-sign McCown maybe) but it wouldn't surprise me if we blow an early pick (relatively, considering where we pick) on a QB with promise. Moore is only contracted for one season and he could still bomb once he's the man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good job. Best of luck #3.

But there is no way in hell we should go into camp with three QBs with less than a year of starting experience combined. We need an over-30 veteran presence in the worst way. If we go into camp with Matt Moore being the veteran by default, we will not only fail as a team, but probably shatter Matt's confidence. That's a burden he shouldn't have on him his first year as a starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...