Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

In Retrospect: How bad was the Delhomme Extension?


AceMan

Recommended Posts

Gilbert actually wasn't as bad as everyone thinks. Although he wasn't worth 2 firsts, his stats are the second best this team has had for a DT. The Jake deal was absolutely worse. You give him all that money after he blows up in the playoffs and had the worst year he ever had just for him to top it the following season and cut him the next offseason and STILL have to pay him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty indifferent about it. If your in Fox's shoes it was probably an ok move, we were cash strapped and we need immediate cap releif, the extension provided that and I guess it was a confidence move for Jake as well. However it was hefty price to pay in retrospect, but it is not something to be bitter about. I believe we have the QB of future in Moore anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It hurt Jerry Richardson's pocketbook. Didn't really hurt the team very much, although I do wonder if it played a role in them sticking with Jake as starter longer than they should have.

It hurt the team because it killed our chances in 2009.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It hurt Jerry Richardson's pocketbook. Didn't really hurt the team very much, although I do wonder if it played a role in them sticking with Jake as starter longer than they should have.

That was the problem. Fox had to play him, or expose the egg on Hurneys face.

As has been said many times, they are a package deal. IMO Hurney should have been gone many times over in the past, and I would not have really wanted Fox gone, but that's not how they roll.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...