Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brian Burns Franchise Tagged


shaq
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, PootieNunu said:

There is also that in Josh Sweat, Who only has 11 less sacks than Burns and is only a year older.

The big thing is Josh sweat isnt looking for 30m+ a season. 

We are not getting what you guys are thinking for Burns unless we sing him to a contract and pay a good portion of his salary before trading him .

No one is giving up a 1st+ for the right to pay him 30m+ a season. 

Now Joey Bosa and Khalil Mack may present a problem...

Tired Korean Drama GIF by The Swoon

Edited by top dawg
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

It's all the sudden not a sellers market lol..So probably shelling out $24M to an unhappy DE in a rebuild year for a 3 win team

Yeah, we might be fúcked now...I hope not, but we might be. Burns still has youth and durability on his side though.

His expectations must come down! 

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Fitts right hand man didn't have any say.  Interesting 

The man who was hired to do the contract wanted them to take the picks.. if you're gonna assume it was a unanimous decision in that FO based off a title then IDK what to tell you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

So the consensus builder wasn't really a consensus builder.   Go it.  

I never fell for that BS anyways, I saw through him when they signed Eflein and Erving day 1 of FA moons ago. Dude didn't know what he was doing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

So the consensus builder wasn't really a consensus builder.   Go it.  

I mean, people go along to get along in lots of arenas in life, especially in an employer-employee, boss-underling relationship. But just because you do that as an underlying, that doesn't mean you agree with everything that's done at the end of the day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, top dawg said:

I mean, people go along to get along in lots of arenas in life, especially in an employer-employee, boss-underling relationship. But just because you do that as an underlying, that doesn't mean you agree with everything that's done at the end of the day.

You think thats dan morgan?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

You think thats dan morgan?

I certainly don't see it as an impossibility. He has to support his family just like anyone. And if you're implying that he was all-in on every decision that Fitterer ever made, I think that's really unrealistic if not unnatural. At the end of the day, we'll likely never know what he was for and against. We don't exactly know what he would've done had he been the man in charge. I think, at best, he was the second person on the Panthers totem pole during his time here. That being said, he was never the final decision-maker. As such, I'll be judging him based upon what he does as the man in charge.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With Freddie Slavin and Svech both playing at MVP levels, no one can touch us. Burns playing well.  Imagine if Jarvy and Aho get going…
    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
×
×
  • Create New...