Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam Howell traded to Seattle


Jackie Lee
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

A year ago Drake Maye being the 3rd QB in this draft class would have been laughable.

 

Honestly I would take Daniels #1 overall over both Caleb and Maye.

Not over Caleb. Caleb has 3 years of QB1 play. Daniels didn’t look it until year 5. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Williams #1, Drake #2, I'm honestly not certain the Pats go QB at #3. They should, I'm just not certain they do.

All signs have pointed to the Commanders going with Daniels.

 

Maye is probably going to New England sadly. That's the worst spot he could land imo.

 

Would love for Minny to trade up for him. Give him Jefferson and he might can make a run for ROTY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

All signs have pointed to the Commanders going with Daniels.

 

Maye is probably going to New England sadly. That's the worst spot he could land imo.

 

Would love for Minny to trade up for him. Give him Jefferson and he might can make a run for ROTY.

It's lying season. They just wanna see if the Pats really want Daniels. I'm just not certain they want a QB at #3, period. It's baffling really. Or maybe they're putting out bullshit? Who knows? We'll here 1000 rumors between now and draft day and 995 of them will be pure bullshit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's lying season. They just wanna see if the Pats really want Daniels. I'm just not certain they want a QB at #3, period. It's baffling really. Or maybe they're putting out bullshit? Who knows? We'll here 1000 rumors between now and draft day and 995 of them will be pure bullshit.

Why would you want another UNC QB in Washington?

 

I think you just like Washington lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Not over Caleb. Caleb has 3 years of QB1 play. Daniels didn’t look it until year 5. 

I would take Daniels over Caleb…and Drake over Caleb as well.

Caleb is crazy overrated and played in a terrible conference for defense and his team went 8-5.  He has serious bust potential 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Shocker said:

I would take Daniels over Caleb…and Drake over Caleb as well.

Caleb is crazy overrated and played in a terrible conference for defense and his team went 8-5.  He has serious bust potential 

They all have bust potential,  it Caleb is the clear cut QB1 this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

They all have bust potential,  it Caleb is the clear cut QB1 this year. 

Not clear cut for me at all.  He had an amazing 31 fumbles in 3 seasons.  He leaves to pocket consistently and just isn’t very consistent as a passer.
 

He hasn’t faced any good defenses in college and when he did he lost.

Edited by Shocker
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...