Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tebow's pre-Wonderlic prayer request falls flat


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

...Jesus himself, a man nobody can still prove even existed...

are you really trying to argue that jesus didn't actually exist? claim he wasn't divine, claim his miracles were frauds, claim what you will, but trying to argue that he never existed historically is buffoonery and intellectual suicide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

are you really trying to argue that jesus didn't actually exist? claim he wasn't divine, claim his miracles were frauds, claim what you will, but trying to argue that he never existed historically is buffoonery and intellectual suicide.

I don't know if he existed or didn't (i tend to think he did). From the research I've done, if he did exist I do not think he claimed to be god. That theology came about around the time the gospel of John was written which was around 90ish AD. Read the earlier gospels, he claims to be the son of god or the son of man. Not god.

btw i don't think its intellectual suicide to say he likelly didn't exist. Its taught in some colleges, heck my friend went to Belmont Abbey and a priest taught him Jesus probably didn't exist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

from the research i've done, if he did exist i do not think he claimed to be god. That theology came about around the time the gospel of john was written which was around 90ish ad. Read the earlier gospels, he claims to be the son of god or the son of man. Not god.

qft

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if he existed or didn't (i tend to think he did). From the research I've done, if he did exist I do not think he claimed to be god. That theology came about around the time the gospel of John was written which was around 90ish AD. Read the earlier gospels, he claims to be the son of god or the son of man. Not god.

if you buy into the trinity (which is pretty clearly stated in the new testament) then the son of god, god, and the spirit of god are all one - jesus' claim to divinity can't be upended on simple terminology conflictions. Moreover, the term "son of man" is a reference to a prophecy in the book of daniel; it's a Messianic title.

btw i don't think its intellectual suicide to say he likelly didn't exist. Its taught in some colleges, heck my friend went to Belmont Abbey and a priest taught him Jesus probably didn't exist.

there is a massive, massive amount of historical evidence that jesus existed, arguably moreso than any other figure in his time period... this really isn't even an issue

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if he existed or didn't (i tend to think he did). From the research I've done, if he did exist I do not think he claimed to be god. That theology came about around the time the gospel of John was written which was around 90ish AD. Read the earlier gospels, he claims to be the son of god or the son of man. Not god.

btw i don't think its intellectual suicide to say he likelly didn't exist. Its taught in some colleges, heck my friend went to Belmont Abbey and a priest taught him Jesus probably didn't exist.

:icon_bs:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:icon_bs:

So you disagree with what the experts say. This is what is taught in Princeton, Oxford and most colleges that teach Textual Criticism. This is what one of my best friends was taught at Belmont Abbey. Its likely if you have an educated pastor that he was taught this too and choose to have faith that it wasn't true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there is a massive, massive amount of historical evidence that jesus existed, arguably moreso than any other figure in his time period... this really isn't even an issue

As I recall, written records of him outside of biblical works are sparse.

Not exactly massive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • After Bountygate and the information that came out on the Saints owners shielding pedophile priests in New Orleans it will forever be the Saints numero uno for me. FUG THE SAINTS! I hope this is just the beginning of a long term period of suffering for that shitty organization run by even shittier human beings. #2.Pats/Belicheat #3. Falcons (Mike Vick years then Matt Ryan/Julio running it up) Ryan pooping his pants and 28-3 def makes my bad days always better just thinking of those. #4 Pretty much any franchise fan base thats obnoxious Steelers, Eagles, Bills, Jets, Giants, Cowboys, etc.
    • Thank God DM used that #8 pick on a bona fide WR1 and not some bum pass rushing prospect like Stewart or someone else. I believe Tet is legit WR1 material and going forward will be our long term answer at that position since we desperately were in need of one once they traded away DJ Moore.  Tet could possibly end up even being better long term than someone who I respect a ton as a WR in Moore. Evans has been a pleasant surprise and great TE/FB depth piece going forward who could make the most of his opportunities.  Any good offense worth a damn in the NFL has 3 TEs that can do multiple things and being scared by Ian Thomas play for years should makes us all appreciate what Evans is quietly doing as a ROOKIE at one of the hardest positions to learn at the pro level.  Keep cooking DM. This season is not over obviously but seeing some growth out of young talent finally is a breathe of fresh fuggin air for once. 
    • Saw this show up in my new feed. Nice to see a couple of our rookies making it into the top 5 so far, even if it is a pff measure... From https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-top-15-rookies-week-9-2025 ... 4. TE Mitchell Evans, Carolina Panthers (78.7) Evans struggled in the Panthers’ tight win over the Packers, finishing with a 41.8 PFF overall grade — third worst among tight ends this week. He was not targeted in the game and played only one snap in pass protection. He did log 15 run-blocking snaps, and although he earned a 68.9 PFF run-blocking grade in zone looks (seven snaps), his 39.0 mark in gap schemes (second worst for the week) dragged him down to a 46.6 PFF run-blocking grade overall — sixth worst for the week. Despite seeing zero targets over his past two games, Evans still leads the Carolina tight end group with a 74.3 PFF receiving grade. He has caught all nine of his targets for 90 yards, six first downs and two touchdowns. Evans also leads the Panthers’ tight end group in PFF run-blocking grade (72.2). He has recorded a 20.5% positive play rate across 175 snaps.  5. WR Tetairoa McMillan, Carolina Panthers (78.6) McMillan had a better day against the Packers, recording four catches for 46 yards. Most of that production came in the first quarter via two 16-yard catches — one of which he snatched from Carrington Valentine’s hands, who was in perfect position to break up the pass. McMillan accounted for three first downs on the day, although Green Bay was able to limit his impact after the catch, holding him to 0.8 yards after the catch per reception. McMillan now has 41 catches for 558 yards — a top-15 mark. He is also tied for second with 19 explosive gains of 15-plus yards. Three of McMillan’s catches against the Packers came between the numbers, bringing him to 22 for 318 yards and 19 first downs (tied for second most) this season. He owns a 26.1% threat rate and a 76.6 PFF receiving grade between the numbers. He also ranks in the top 10 in explosive gains (10) and yards after the catch per reception (5.5) within that area of the field. 
×
×
  • Create New...