Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Receiver Archetype We're targeting...


SaltAndPepper
 Share

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Kinda like how we panicked and traded up to take DJ Johnson at 80, and then the Steelers took Nick Herbig with pick 132, the pick we traded to move up? lol. (7 hurries 2 forced fumbles and 3 sacks on 178 snaps)

fortunately we aren't the only ones who do it.

unfortunately, we have done it a lot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/31/2024 at 2:42 PM, Bear Hands said:

From what I gather, they could be targeting an IDL like Byron Murphy or Newton, otherwise, Quinyon Mitchell would be a good fit at CB.  I also imagine Brian Thomas could be available around their pick.  Lots of possibilities for them. 

Overall, the OL and DL in this draft will be more coveted than let on and I think there may only be 5 WRs gone by 33.  

I think we're looking at some sort of combo from this crop below at 33 and 39:

WR: AD Mitchell, Pearsall, Franklin, McConkey

TE: Sanders

EDGE: Chop, Kneeland, Ellis 

CB: McKinstry, DeJean, Tampa, Wiggins

IDL: JP-J, Suamataia

The top-3 LBs and maybe Trey Benson long shots at 39.  

I would add RB in there. They did bring in Jonathan Brooks for a Top 30 and their are rumors they like Will Shipley's versatility. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OL then RB would make heads explode but its might not be too unlikely 
    • Wonder if we draft a RB. Seems like a lot of eggs in Brooks’ basket right now.  And the OL, no kidding. If that running game goes to hell with what we have at QB, you can forget competing. It is so much more important than sticking another wideout on the field. Take your wideout later. 
    • I have lots of different thoughts on it. This argument, the primary thing is I don’t like seeing him or anyone, being convicted on hearsay and/or pure speculation. Which some are doing.  I don’t care That much about defending Morgan as I do about the criticism being fair minded.    You sort of assert that Dan was just a yes man. I don’t think we know if he ever pushed back against Fitterer but I have this instinct thing that needs me to satisfy the question of: if Tepper was so down on a Fitterer as to fire him, why in the world would he hire his carbon copy? I guess maybe he wanted a yes man.Like I said, lots of different thoughts.     I am just not gonna judge him that harshly based only on speculation. I am sticking with what he has done starting when he was hired as GM. Maybe I am more lenient because the first season for him and Canales, I gave both a pass. Said I would judge them after the first year. Stuck to it. If you can get to the reality that neither were ready for the job and say okay give them a year get their feet wet, it looks a lot better.    And we are not bound to Bryce yet. Yes, for yet another fuging year he can probably marginally improve and slide by like he has been doing. But if they add even more people and he regresses? I think we could see some relief.    The QB room? As I understand it, Pickett was Canales’ choice. If we need to blame people for poo. In a sense, he is very Bryce like. So makes a good plug in. I get that a little bit. We still have the draft. If they do better than Jake Plummer or Hooker I’ll know they are trying.   
×
×
  • Create New...