Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fox: Cutting Jake was best for the team

Sam Mills Fan

By Sam Mills Fan,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Sam Mills Fan Newbie

Sam Mills Fan

Posted
Posted

Mark your calendars Huddlers, this is the one time a decade that John Fox opens up and says some newsmaking things in an interview:

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2010/03/26/1339200/fox-delhommes-exit-best-for-team.html

He basically says that it's unprecedented for a long-term starter to stay around another year on the bench because it divides loyalties in the locker room (which is exactly what I had been saying since the season ended).

Also, he talks a little about fans booing near the end.

I recommend reading it if only because there are some new things in there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherPhann Newbie

PantherPhann

Posted
Posted

Mark your calendars Huddlers, this is the one time a decade that John Fox opens up and says some newsmaking things in an interview:

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2010/03/26/1339200/fox-delhommes-exit-best-for-team.html

He basically says that it's unprecedented for a long-term starter to stay around another year on the bench because it divides loyalties in the locker room (which is exactly what I had been saying since the season ended).

Also, he talks a little about fans booing near the end.

I recommend reading it if only because there are some new things in there.

I'm not sure that jake would've been a problem on the team. I think that he would've been a good teacher and a quality backup. I also think that his love for the Panthers is more than his love/desire to start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jangler Apprentice

Jangler

Posted
Posted

I'm not sure that jake would've been a problem on the team. I think that he would've been a good teacher and a quality backup. I also think that his love for the Panthers is more than his love/desire to start.

Demoted players hanging around is never good for a team. No matter how much of a stand up good guy Jake is...it would have not been good for the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KatsAzz Grand Master

KatsAzz

Posted
Posted

Even if Jake was ok with it. Some of the players are going to be loyal to Jake and some to Moore. This divides the team and this is why we let him go.

That sums it up nicely...Letting Jake go was a wise decision on the Panthers part.I don't believe Matt Moore would have reached his full potential with Jake lurking in the background...Also the Panthers would be facing the possibility of a divided lockerroom when Matt had a bad game,as all QB's do, sooner or later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Murph Community Regular

Murph

Posted
Posted

"[Moore] is young. He’s got a lot of physical tools. I like his mindset. I saw him improve. … He had about a 93 quarterback rating. We had hovered around 59 most of the season. That gave us a chance to win games and hopefully he can do that moving forward.”

Fox gave away what we pretty much already knew about him. He stuck with the guy giving with a rating of 59 until he had to bench him because of the finger injury. Call it loyality, fear of the unknown, Moore not acting like a Fox type football player on the practice field, or whatever...that was still dumb dumb dumb.

I'm so glad JR is calling the shots now. Fox's stranglehold on the FO is loosened and he cant be ultra conservative/safe anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • electro's horse
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By electro's horse · Posted

      Wow I can’t believe the panthers tried to trade up, failed, but still got the guy they wanted to trade up for. I wonder if anyone else has ever said that next you’ll tell me they had Hunter and Brazzell graded as first rounders. 
    • strato
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By strato · Posted

      I don’t think people are saying that picking up the option is a call for the pitchforks. We would have had to do things differently a couple of years back to make declining the option a valid move. We didn’t and here we are. People largely accept that. The pattern it adheres to, reinforces the nausea we feel when the idea of an extension, and at top of the market no less, comes up.  One that he hasn’t shown he deserves.   Same as he did not deserve to be drafted 1.1. Look at Pavia and what really is the difference? Bryce is a nice guy and Pavia is an asshole lol. They are both no margin for error non day one talents. One went undrafted.  Probably should have been drafted day three anyway. The other was way over drafted.  
    • SmokinwithWilly
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      We hate losing. I don't know Bryce to hate him. His play as a QB, I absolutely hate. It's just not good enough. If there were a lottery held to select the order and all 32 starting QBs could be drafted as the starting QB for whatever team selected them, how long do you think it would be before Bryce's name was called? Top 10, top 20, bottom 8? Think about it.  For me, having never seen back to back games with franchise QB level performance in 3 years tells me what I need to know. We still need to be looking for our solution at QB.     
×
×
  • Create New...