Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What do you grade this draft?

kungfoodude

By kungfoodude,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Huddle Draft Grade  

130 members have voted

  1. 1. What is your draft grade?


Recommended Posts

Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

It technically takes years to deteremine how good a player typically is.

 

Not asking that question. Asking what people thought of the draft.

It's still too soon to tell. I mean we had needs everywhere.  They addressed a few of them. How well depends on how these guys play and how good the coaching and scheme is. You saw what happened last year. The coaching and scheme were completely FUBAR. How do you judge a draft by that?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, Jon Snow said:

It's still too soon to tell. I mean we had needs everywhere.  They addressed a few of them. How well depends on how these guys play and how good the coaching and scheme is. You saw what happened last year. The coaching and scheme were completely FUBAR. How do you judge a draft by that?

Well typically you judge a draft by how good you thought it was. At least most people do.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jfra78 Grand Master

jfra78

Posted
Posted

I gave it a B because we got a second for basically 2 5ths.  I like X, Brooks, and Sanders, the LB was a head scratcher to me. If you switch Sanders and Wallace, it makes more sense in my head.  The offseason as a whole I would give an A.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Well typically you judge a draft by how good you thought it was. At least most people do.

That is based solely on emotion and perceived value.  That is just too subjective. No opinion can be valid or invalid until the guys play a year or two. 

Edited by Jon Snow
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mountainpantherfan2 Explorer

mountainpantherfan2

Posted
Posted

I’ve seen three separate times already where the Panthers have been rated in the top 5 for this draft.  Specifically focusing on our first 5 picks.  
 

Granted I’ve not been actively looking for these rankings so there may be some out there that have the panthers not rated as highly.

 

As for me, I give the draft class a B but would give the total outcome an A with us picking up the 2nd for next year. Like many others I really thought we would address the center position early. That was the only negative. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

That is based solely on emotion and perceived value.  That is just too subjective. No opinion can be valid or invalid until the guys play a year or two. 

Opnions are always valid because they are.....opinions. Right, wrong, indifferent....they are opinions.

This is a poll to see what the fanbase thought of this draft. That's what this is for. 

Your "opinion" seems to be very emtionally that you don't have an opinion. Strange hill to die on but I guess that's your opinion on the matter.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • frankw
      An Offensive Tackle for the Long Term, but....

      By frankw · Posted

      Brother you've been WR driven for going on almost two decades now.  No need for us to discuss further.
    • TD alt
      An Offensive Tackle for the Long Term, but....

      By TD alt · Posted

      First, apologies @MHS831, I know you began this about tackles, and it was good. But... Frank, your post is just another Bryce sucks post. You obviously believe, like your buddy, that if we draft a WR it's all about evaluating Bryce Young or coddling Bryce Young. In short, it would be about improving the damned team. If anything, if Bryce is as destined to fail (or is already a failure right now... irredeemable), then another playmaker at WR would just seal the envelope and send him on his way. In my world, that's a good thing.  If some of you think that Bryce is a lame duck, then why wouldn't you want to set the offense up for the next QB to come in and be dropped into the offense to have success? Or, maybe you think it's all a moot point anyway because Tepper sucks, Dan Morgan sucks, Canales sucks, Ejiro sucks, Brandt Tilis sucks---everybidy sucks! If that's the case, then why does anyone care who or what we draft? Obviously some of you have all the answers and can run a gotdamn franchise better than the FO does now.
    • Swaggasaurus
      An Offensive Tackle for the Long Term, but....

      By Swaggasaurus · Posted

      Yeah man, idk. I’m not super big on looking at the position group overall and damning the group. I’ll do the same with less words for WR. I think Proctor is the ultimate fit because he could be your future left or right tackle or left or right guard. Guys a starter, how much Zavala, Christensen, Curhan, and Corbett did we see last year again? Mauigoa will not be there when we pick, but you take him for the same reason you take Proctor minus maybe the LT. Freeling *could* be an upgrade at LT for the future. You don’t take Miller or Iheanahor because the position flexibility isn’t there, likely RT only guys. Those Utah guys are light in the ass, don’t want. Now I do WR. All extremely unproductive when compared to previous Round 1 WR. Tate- Gone Lemon- Complete player, not a burner, would take at 19 Tyson- Made of glass, Colorado washout  Cooper- Not the best hands. Like 300 of his yards were lucky ass stumble blooper looking poo. Bernard gives you similar but better in the 2nd. KC- Slaps then catches the ball. Lightning fast for about 20 yards. Good return man. poo QBs probably more to unlock. Would take at 19 if Proctor, Freeling, Lemon were gone. Washington guy- Lumbers, the smoothness Canales hyped for TMac, not there with him. We need a different style player.    
×
×
  • Create New...