Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will the Panthers be better than most are expecting?


jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

if this team looks more prepared than it did last preseason, then sure. Weirdly, i think we get out to a 2-0 or 3-1 start until someone gets film. I don't want to hear it's just preseason again. We took 11 sacks in practice against the Jets and that certainly proved to carry over to the regular season. The stale offense in the preseason games also carried over. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, RumHam said:

if this team looks more prepared than it did last preseason, then sure. Weirdly, i think we get out to a 2-0 or 3-1 start until someone gets film. I don't want to hear it's just preseason again. We took 11 sacks in practice against the Jets and that certainly proved to carry over to the regular season. The stale offense in the preseason games also carried over. 

They didn't need much film last year. Atlanta shook Young early. Starting with a division rival makes me think it will happen again with a healthy Saints D. If Young is still scared to throw downfield then it will be over until the prevent D Stat padding time.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, RumHam said:

if this team looks more prepared than it did last preseason, then sure. Weirdly, i think we get out to a 2-0 or 3-1 start until someone gets film. I don't want to hear it's just preseason again. We took 11 sacks in practice against the Jets and that certainly proved to carry over to the regular season. The stale offense in the preseason games also carried over. 

I think I remember saying that last year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

It's be hard to be worse than most are predicting us to be. 

That being said, nothing is impossible.

yeah lol never say it can't get any worse with David Tepper in charge 

Edited by bandu
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...