Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Baby names

Matt Foley

By Matt Foley,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Matt Foley Newbie

Matt Foley

Posted
Posted

The Namipedia Top 10 Boys' and Girls' Names of 2010 So Far:

GIRLS

1. Charlotte

2. Olivia

3. Elizabeth

4. Amelia

5. Emily

6. Ava

7. Ella

8. Claire

9. Emma

10. Violet

BOYS

1. Oliver

2. Owen

3. Henry

4. Liam

5. James

6. Jack

7. Alexander

8. Benjamin

9. William

10. Noah

The Hot Risers:

GIRLS

1. Sookie

2. Tenley

3. Eloise

4. Genevieve

5. Piper

BOYS

1. Castiel

2. Declan

3. Atreyu

4. Dashiell

5. Phineas

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CharlotteBeer.com Newbie

CharlotteBeer.com

Posted
Posted

Sookie? Phineas?

Hey, while we're on the subject of baby names, let me run one by you guys. Now let me make it clear I would never use this name because of the product it is associated with, but just listen to the word without thinking of the connotation.

Valium.

I think it's a damn strong, masculine name. Sort of like a Norse mix between Valiant and William. I just wish it wasn't already taken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CharlotteBeer.com Newbie

CharlotteBeer.com

Posted
Posted

Phineas Frog....or Fog :)

That's where I knew it form

This is who I think of when the name Phineas comes up.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phineas_Gage

Phineas P. Gage (July 9?, 1823 – May 21, 1860)[n 2] was a railroad construction foreman now remembered for his incredible survival of an accident in which a large iron rod was driven completely through his head, destroying much of his brain's left frontal lobe, and for that injury's reported effects on his personality and behavior—effects so profound that friends saw him as "no longer Gage."

Now that I think about it, Gage is a pretty badass name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

Now that I think about it, Gage is a pretty badass name.

Not if you read "Pet Sematary" :eek:

The weirdest names seem to come out of Hollywood. Stuff that just makes you go "what the..." :confused:

I've begun to think the Hollywood crowd has a contest going as to who can get their kid's ass kicked the most times on the playground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jangler Newbie

Jangler

Posted
Posted

Sookie? Phineas?

Hey, while we're on the subject of baby names, let me run one by you guys. Now let me make it clear I would never use this name because of the product it is associated with, but just listen to the word without thinking of the connotation.

Valium.

I think it's a damn strong, masculine name. Sort of like a Norse mix between Valiant and William. I just wish it wasn't already taken.

0a93d675396962.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites
charlotte49er Newbie

charlotte49er

Posted
Posted

The trouble when you get to my age, is that all the names remind you of Biotches that cheated on you, or a-holes that you knew along the way.

I always liked Sam. If I ever had a son, I would have really pushed to name him that. Simple, yet strong!

If I had a girl, I would have pushed for Lynn. I have known some beautiful Lynn's in my time. (And my favorite MLB pitcher of all time is really named Lynn. Lynn Nolan "The Express!" Ryan!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...