Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Practice for Wednesday, August 21st


Icege
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Navy_football said:

I don't think people see the hypocrisy in those takes. That's like saying, I want him to lead the team to success and be the best QB in the NFL, but until he does I'm gonna let everybody that will listen know that he can't do it. Making definitive statements like - he's too short, too little, too slow, too weak, not smart enough to even play in the NFL. He doesn't have any tools, zero, nothing to be successful in the NFL. But if he ever figures it out, he's my guy! 

Make it make sense.

Reality is if he shows any improvement, they'll give the credit somewhere else. When it'll really just be he finally gets NFL average in areas like coaching, scheme, playcalling, pass protection, and receiver play. But he's supposed to overcome below average in all those areas as a rookie? And if you just acknowledge that lack of supporting cast prevents us from making a final decision on him yet, then you're a stan or a Bryce defender. No, I just have objective common sense, sir. 

That's the part that's crazy to me. People are making clearly definitive statements and then dogging out other posters for not having the same perspective only to turn around and cry victim when they're told to keep pounding sand.

Being critical is more than okay. I was incredibly hard on Chuba his first season because of all of the drops that he had and gave immediate praise during his second season when he showed improvement. At no time did I make the declaration that he'd never be able to play RB in the NFL because that just isn't something that can be known from that rookie season. I was even more critical of YGM up until last season when his effort and motor paid off some because he was on the field more often to use it to his advantage (Yetur made his impact by wearing down opposing OL and still having his foot on the gas late in the game). I didn't think that he needed to be resigned this offseason but didn't spend every day of the offseason jumping into threads and rolling my eyes at folks that thought he should stay. Clearly, the issue isn't being critical of a player. It's the derailing of threads and condescending attitude of a select few posters that have been an issue to the point of where a compliment sandwich thread was created to make it less insufferable.

I miss when fans had this attitude tbh:

 

Edited by Icege
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Icege said:

That's the part that's crazy to me. People are making clearly definitive statements and then dogging out other posters for not having the same perspective only to turn around and cry victim when they're told to keep pounding sand.

Being critical is more than okay. I was incredibly hard on Chuba his first season because of all of the drops that he had and gave immediate praise during his second season when he showed improvement. At no time did I make the declaration that he'd never be able to play RB in the NFL because that just isn't something that can be known from that rookie season. I was even more critical of YGM up until last season when his effort and motor paid off some because he was on the field more often to use it to his advantage (Yetur made his impact by wearing down opposing OL and still having his foot on the gas late in the game). I didn't think that he needed to be resigned this offseason but didn't spend every day of the offseason jumping into threads and rolling my eyes at folks that thought he should stay. Clearly, the issue isn't being critical of a player. It's the derailing of threads and condescending attitude of a select few posters that have been an issue to the point of where a compliment sandwich thread was created to make it less insufferable.

I miss when fans had this attitude tbh:

 

Fans do have that attitude though.  There's people on the forum right now saying the same stuff.  Zod wouldn't have had to say support Armanti and get over it if there weren't people questioning it.

Nothing new under the sun.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

I respect your principles and determination.  I would have done that 10 or 20 years ago.  But now it's just not worth the effort to me.  I'd rather just pay lol.  It's like Spotify.  You made it easier and better than pirating music.  I'll pay for that.

Totally get and understand it. If you have the means to do it the easy way, do it.

But also, you know, fug the man, and all.

GIF by Giphy QA

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, strato said:

I hear you on the winning. I understand that there are ways to scheme this and we probably both understand that if there is no field stretching going on, it will be very difficult to make anything work.

I also see ‘not the worst’, breaking new ground etc. Those aren’t positives to me. 

Still, it is an easy question to answer, isn’t it? =The conclusion may be loaded, or not. Seems simple.  Is this like those hearings where someone asks a direct question but cannot ever get a simple answer? It is a pretty direct question.

My answer is: I don’t see a single physical trait that is above average by NFL standards.  

Which IMO when speculating about NFL success, you want to have something above average to hang your hat on.

I guess it is still the processor, but he has to operate around historically advanced physical specimens. To not acknowledge the .. physics(?) of it seems to be at least a little intentionally unobservant. 

That’s all. 

 

I get that, but a lot of this stuff is a matter of definition and opinion. Like "average." I mean, being able to legitimately throw 55 yards in the air, is that "average?" Being able to escape pressure consistently and gain 5-15 yards, is that "average?" 

I mean, did Bryce's failings last season really have to do with a lack of "above average" physical tools, or was it related to something else? Could it simply have been bad mechanics or bad coaching or a combination? I mean, I really didn't see anything wholly physically-related that suggested to me that he couldn't do the job but for possibly his height. For me, that's a big issue, but I can't even say with surety that it was a legit issue, and we have seen other short guys have some degree of success in the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, TD alt said:

I get that, but a lot of this stuff is a matter of definition and opinion. Like "average." I mean, being able to legitimately throw 55 yards in the air, is that "average?" Being able to escape pressure consistently and gain 5-15 yards, is that "average?" 

I mean, did Bryce's failings last season really have to do with a lack of "above average" physical tools, or was it related to something else? Could it simply have been bad mechanics or bad coaching or a combination? I mean, I really didn't see anything wholly physically-related that suggested to me that he couldn't do the job but for possibly his height. For me, that's a big issue, but I can't even say with surety that it was a legit issue, and we have seen other short guys have some degree of success in the NFL.

Okay. I thought he got run down by DL. So I did not see any enticing speed. 

I saw him get pulled down by what looked like two fingers on a DLs hand. So, I don’t know what tool this is but he won’t be throwing a lot of balls with guys having a hand on him.

And the ball security issues from not being very strong are there.

I have said a ton that his velocity is suspect. That is most where the ability to chunk it a long way enters in here for me. It is not the 70 yard throw only, because that is a nice option to have as well, but it is the time defenders have to close and this is split second poo at that level. Is that not a valid concern? 

Then we talk oh he can’t work from the pocket... I fuging hate that concession, sorry. Hate to see it made. Hope that is wrong. (it ties in with the lack of above average foot speed, just more chances to be run down. I know plays will be made too, I just don’t like it much. And all those throwaways which I am not saying it is dumb to throw it away, on principle, just so many because he bailed at pressure maybe it will be better)

Whatever with all of it, I have typed a lot of words trying to figure out how to work with his abilities rather than just flat out say he can’t but it’s just not ideal even if it improves. 

 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Fans do have that attitude though.  There's people on the forum right now saying the same stuff.  Zod wouldn't have had to say support Armanti and get over it if there weren't people questioning it.

Nothing new under the sun.

Comparing being critical of a 4th round running back with being critical of a first overall pick we traded a literal haul for....

lol

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, strato said:

Okay. I thought he got run down by DL. So I did not see any enticing speed. 

I saw him get pulled down by what looked like two fingers on a DLs hand. So, I don’t know what tool this is but he won’t be throwing a lot of balls with guys having a hand on him.

And the ball security issues from not being very strong are there.

I have said a ton that his velocity is suspect. That is most where the ability to chunk it a long way enters in here for me. It is not the 70 yard throw only, because that is a nice option to have as well, but it is the time defenders have to close and this is split second poo at that level. Is that not a valid concern? 

Then we talk oh he can’t work from the pocket... I fuging hate that concession, sorry. Hate to see it made. Hope that is wrong. (it ties in with the lack of above average foot speed, just more chances to be run down. I know plays will be made too, I just don’t like it much. And all those throwaways which I am not saying it is dumb to throw it away, on principle, just so many because he bailed at pressure maybe it will be better)

Whatever with all of it, I have typed a lot of words trying to figure out how to work with his abilities rather than just flat out say he can’t but it’s just not ideal even if it improves. 

 

I hear what you're saying, I do. I have my skepticism, as I've stated many times now, but a lot of QBs have been run down by a DL, or pulled down by a DL, fingers or not.  We've also seen Bryce get away and scramble effectively. Each play across the NFL has a life of its own. 

Until I see more of Bryce in an average offense behind an average line, personally I am not going to draw any definitive conclusions. Last year was such a clusterfûck for so many reasons, I think that I can give him a few more games before totally giving up on him.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TD alt said:

I hear what you're saying, I do. I have my skepticism, as I've stated many times now, but a lot of QBs have been run down by a DL, or pulled down by a DL, fingers or not.  We've also seen Bryce get away and scramble effectively. Each play across the NFL has a life of its own. 

Until I see more of Bryce in an average offense behind an average line, personally I am not going to draw any definitive conclusions. Last year was such a clusterfûck for so many reasons, I think that I can give him a few more games before totally giving up on him.

Thank you man for the conversation. I am only definitive on he is working at a big disadvantage. People have made that work, before. So I am not saying Never either just dammit mostly lol. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, frankw said:

Comparing being critical of a 4th round running back with being critical of a first overall pick we traded a literal haul for....

lol

Well, that's not Bryce's fault. Players, regardless of position or draft status, are still just players. As such,  it's not necessarily fair or even analytical to judge them by draft capital spent to acquire them. The GM (and perhaps elements of the FO) deserves that criticism. To be clear, players are going to get criticized, but personally I stick to things that they can control.

Edited by TD alt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TD alt said:

Well, that's not Bryce's fault. Players, regardless of position or draft status, are still just players. As such,  it's not necessarily fair or even analytical to judge them by draft capital spent to acquire them. The GM (and perhaps elements of the FO) deserves that criticism. To be clear, players are going to get criticized, but personally I stick to things that they can control.

Of course not all of this is his fault. We can debate the fairness of criticism relating to athletes. And to be clear I am very pro player as far as how the league is setup and the share of profits. I legitimately loathe NFL owners. Cannot make that more clear.

But it's always been this way for first overall picks. Cam Newton was dragged through the mud up and down for ten years. And he was a ROTY out of the gate. People still dogged on him and demanded more. Bryce will be fine.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, frankw said:

Of course not all of this is his fault. We can debate the fairness of criticism relating to athletes. And to be clear I am very pro player as far as how the league is setup and the share of profits. I legitimately loathe NFL owners. Cannot make that more clear.

But it's always been this way for first overall picks. Cam Newton was dragged through the mud up and down for ten years. And he was a ROTY out of the gate. People still dogged on him and demanded more. Bryce will be fine.

Because at the end of the day, nobody's gotta step up for Superman.  You can, but its not necessary.  His play spoke for itself.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Here is how Morgan is strategic-He re-signs Scott because he was not going S in round 1--he had the chance, and he did not.  He saw the top of the draft at T and knew none of them would be ready to start day 1, so he signs a veteran to a one-year deal, giving his tackle selection a chance to learn and prepare for what might be LT or RT.  Those two moves suggested, perhaps ironically because they contradict each other, what he was going to do, based on the talent pool.  He never brought in a Robinson replacement at DE/NT, and then moves up to draft one.   I almost wonder if the intent was to draft DT/DE all along at some point, maybe with a trade back, but then Freeling dropped to them.   Of course, we felt that they were looking WR, and wonder if the plan was to draft a WR in round 2 if you traded back in round 1.  However, when Freeling was there, the trade back fell apart.  Then we traded up for Hunter.  We could stick with XL and hope Metchie steps up, so we sat still in round three and took Brazell II, a 1000 yard speedster and perfect Z WR.  What a break. At that time, CB and Center were our biggest needs, and with several possible centers on the board and a good fit for our defense at CB, we grabbed Will Lee III.  Lee and Thornton have people in front of them, but I think Morgan knew we needed a guy who can play the outside and press--and probably step in as Jackson's replacement in 2027.    After making trades to get back into the fifth round, where we grabbed one of the best centers in the draft.  This is significant because we signed Fortner to a one-year deal; maybe Morgan saw what some of us saw--the center position is strong in this draft--on day 3, and day 3 players need a year, in most cases.  Moments later, a safety they had been talking to whose skill set matched what we are looking for in a FS.  As stated, Scott was signed,  but the fact that the Panthers were talking to Wheatley and not Theiemann means that they might have known they were not going FS early, but would need a developmental FS later--which explains why we signed Scott.  So if you pay attention to the one-year, vet deals, you can tell where we planned to sign later-round, developmental players.  What positions did we draft early that did not have 1-year veterans signed in front of them:  DL (Hunter) and WR (I don't count Metchie because I count starting-level players). I would not be surprised to learn later that the plan was DT and WR in rounds 1 and 2--then Freeling fell.  Notice that Freeling--from Mt Pleasant SC, did not come in for a visit.  Most of the other OT candidates had short arms or were certain to be gone. I don't think Freeling was in their plans.  I think a trade back and Hunter and maybe Boston was the vision.  I am guessing that CB was also high on their list.   So in this draft, we got 
    • This is one area I think that is not getting enough exposure in the midst of all the optimism. I like Chuba a great deal from a personal standpoint but he has largely proven nothing on a consistent basis yet. He's had the one season of production but before that most people pegged us as moving on. And last year injuries or not he just did not have that juice. The rest of the guys are completely unproven. I don't see anyone among the group having a game or a handful of games worth of high level production the way Rico Dowdle did last year. And yeah he dropped off and yeah he got an attitude about our incompetent handling of the touches which was honestly justified on his part and he moved on but he did legitimately save our season. That's what it is going to take to seize control of the NFC South. We all know that we will not be passing all over defenses. It is what it is. So who amongst this RB group is capable of doing that? And if we are struggling to run the ball AND pass are we going to revert to making excuses for our coach and QB again? That is definitely getting old.
×
×
  • Create New...