Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Mahomes wasn't Mahomes in college.

He was still identified as a top 10 pick even with a losing college record. How in the world as a college coach do you have a losing record with a top 10 pick talent at QB? Hell, the ghost of Mack Brown still managed to have winning records with Howell and Maye even with no defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I'm surprised you out on Kingsbury. It's literally the type of move this program needs. At least we have a shot to outscore teams.

 

Who are your top 3 realistic candidates for HC?

I think all the other fans in the ACC hope that UNC hires Kingsbury.  He has a losing record everywhere he has ever coached.  

If UNC hires Kingsbury, and Dallas hires Deion, as a fan of neither team, that would be the best off season ever.  

Edited by Davidson Deac II
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Who's 'we'? You're a Sanders fan. 

So I been wasting my time talking UNC since I joined this site?

 

Catch me on the basketball forum. That's when UNC really matters. The football program just doesn't take it seriously enough for me to be all diehard. I'm never going to invest my time into a bad product.

 

You know how many Panthers games I have missed under Tepper? It's a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He was still identified as a top 10 pick even with a losing college record. How in the world as a college coach do you have a losing record with a top 10 pick talent at QB? Hell, the ghost of Mack Brown still managed to have winning records with Howell and Maye even with no defense.

Who's your top 3 HC candidates for UNC?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't have 3 ACC teams in the playoffs and not reward the Big 12 champion smh 

 

These clowns voting are clearly SEC and ACC biased. I feel for all the other conferences. This entire poll is a scam. They also got Alabama just on on the outside so if any of the playoff teams lose next week they are right back in the playoffs.

 

This is a joke!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Cocks gonna destroy those kitties.

 

SEC football will always expose the ACC when the games really matter.

Not so much in the Palmetto Bowl.  And also not always, see Dabo’s multiple nattys over SEC teams.  

You’re an interesting cat Mr.Colorado/SEC/Miami/formerTarheel fan. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

You can't have 3 ACC teams in the playoffs and not reward the Big 12 champion smh 

 

These clowns voting are clearly SEC and ACC biased. I feel for all the other conferences. This entire poll is a scam. They also got Alabama just on on the outside so if any of the playoff teams lose next week they are right back in the playoffs.

 

This is a joke!

What do you mean not reward the Big12 champion? 

2 ACC teams projected in tonight not 3.  

Clemson is #12 but they are first out because they are forced to leapfrog in the #16 BIG12 champ 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ok--I have seen some sample items, and I would like to see something (if possible) measures on field intelligence--maybe how quickly you can grasp a playbook or absorb film session adjustments...Back when we had Morrison as team president and Hurney as GM, I offered to assess (as part of my research in education requirement at a University) emotional intelligence and learning styles of players to help coaches teach more effectively.  Morrison loved it and contacted me about it.  Hurney was not interested, and it fell through the cracks.  My pitch?  If only 50% of first-rounders become successful NFL players and that number drops significantly, can you tell me that you are effectively measuring talent?  Morrison thought it was a good point and wanted to do something that might improve long-term success rates--that would impact the cap management, etc.  Marty, according to Morrison, said he was not interested at this time and if so, he would want a football guy to do it.  (I told Morrison that I played in college and Hurney, a sports reporter at one time, did not. (He told me that Hurney played as a Guard in college--who knew?) Any way, about that time, Morrison left (2017) and the idea was dropped.  I reached back out a year later or so to Marty was still not interested.  A few days later, his wife accused him of assault or something, so I dropped it.
    • Pretty sure they still do the Wonderlic they just don't publicly release the scores.
    • I just thought he was under the radar--but thanks for opening our eyes to him.  I think we should have better measures for intelligence--such as reaction time, angles, etc. Legette is raw as heck, for example, and his RAS was very high.  We used to do the Wonderlic (which was not great) but to know how effectively a player makes on field decisions would be great.  
×
×
  • Create New...